| SooperKanoon Citation | sooperkanoon.com/84055 |
| Court | US Supreme Court |
| Decided On | 1880 |
| Case Number | 103 U.S. 730 |
| Appellant | The Adriatic |
Notice (8): Undefined variable: kword [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 123]Code Context}//highest occurence of word in the judgementecho $this->Wand->highlight($this->Excerpt->extractRelevant($kword,strtolower(strip_tags($desc['Judgement']['judgement']))), $query) . "</div>";$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="731"> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83538/abbotsford"> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83898/benefactor"> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'adriatic', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'adriatic' $args = array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84055/adriatic' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'Jan', (int) 1 => '01', (int) 2 => '1880' )include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 123 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 123]the adriatic - 103 u.s. 730 (1880) u.s. supreme court the adriatic, 103 u.s. 730 (1880) the adriatic 103 u.s. 730 appeal from the circuit court of the united states for the southern district of new york syllabus the court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. mr. chief justice waite delivered the opinion of the court. sec. 698 of the revised statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a.....Code Context}//highest occurence of word in the judgementecho $this->Wand->highlight($this->Excerpt->extractRelevant($kword,strtolower(strip_tags($desc['Judgement']['judgement']))), $query) . "</div>";$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="731"> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83538/abbotsford"> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83898/benefactor"> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'adriatic', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'adriatic' $args = array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84055/adriatic' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'Jan', (int) 1 => '01', (int) 2 => '1880' )include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 123 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');}echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="731"> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83538/abbotsford"> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83898/benefactor"> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'adriatic', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'adriatic' $args = array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84055/adriatic' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'Jan', (int) 1 => '01', (int) 2 => '1880' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. ', (int) 7 => ' <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. ', (int) 8 => ' <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 9 => ' <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court ', (int) 10 => ' <p> <a> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> ', (int) 11 => ' <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: ', (int) 13 => ' <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." ', (int) 14 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 15 $i = (int) 0include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
The Adriatic
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');}echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="731"> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83538/abbotsford"> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83898/benefactor"> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'adriatic', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'adriatic' $args = array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84055/adriatic' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'Jan', (int) 1 => '01', (int) 2 => '1880' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. ', (int) 7 => ' <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. ', (int) 8 => ' <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 9 => ' <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court ', (int) 10 => ' <p> <a> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> ', (int) 11 => ' <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: ', (int) 13 => ' <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." ', (int) 14 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 15 $i = (int) 1include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
103 U.S. 730
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');}echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="731"> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83538/abbotsford"> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83898/benefactor"> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'adriatic', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'adriatic' $args = array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84055/adriatic' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'Jan', (int) 1 => '01', (int) 2 => '1880' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. ', (int) 7 => ' <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. ', (int) 8 => ' <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 9 => ' <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court ', (int) 10 => ' <p> <a> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> ', (int) 11 => ' <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: ', (int) 13 => ' <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." ', (int) 14 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 15 $i = (int) 2include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');}echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="731"> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83538/abbotsford"> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83898/benefactor"> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'adriatic', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'adriatic' $args = array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84055/adriatic' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'Jan', (int) 1 => '01', (int) 2 => '1880' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. ', (int) 7 => ' <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. ', (int) 8 => ' <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 9 => ' <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court ', (int) 10 => ' <p> <a> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> ', (int) 11 => ' <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: ', (int) 13 => ' <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." ', (int) 14 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 15 $i = (int) 3include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');}echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="731"> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83538/abbotsford"> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83898/benefactor"> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'adriatic', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'adriatic' $args = array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84055/adriatic' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'Jan', (int) 1 => '01', (int) 2 => '1880' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. ', (int) 7 => ' <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. ', (int) 8 => ' <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 9 => ' <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court ', (int) 10 => ' <p> <a> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> ', (int) 11 => ' <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: ', (int) 13 => ' <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." ', (int) 14 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 15 $i = (int) 4include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');}echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="731"> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83538/abbotsford"> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83898/benefactor"> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'adriatic', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'adriatic' $args = array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84055/adriatic' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'Jan', (int) 1 => '01', (int) 2 => '1880' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. ', (int) 7 => ' <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. ', (int) 8 => ' <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 9 => ' <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court ', (int) 10 => ' <p> <a> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> ', (int) 11 => ' <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: ', (int) 13 => ' <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." ', (int) 14 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 15 $i = (int) 5include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
Syllabus
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');}echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="731"> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83538/abbotsford"> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83898/benefactor"> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'adriatic', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'adriatic' $args = array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84055/adriatic' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'Jan', (int) 1 => '01', (int) 2 => '1880' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. ', (int) 7 => ' <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. ', (int) 8 => ' <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 9 => ' <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court ', (int) 10 => ' <p> <a> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> ', (int) 11 => ' <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: ', (int) 13 => ' <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." ', (int) 14 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 15 $i = (int) 6include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law.
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');}echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="731"> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83538/abbotsford"> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83898/benefactor"> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'adriatic', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'adriatic' $args = array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84055/adriatic' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'Jan', (int) 1 => '01', (int) 2 => '1880' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. ', (int) 7 => ' <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. ', (int) 8 => ' <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 9 => ' <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court ', (int) 10 => ' <p> <a> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> ', (int) 11 => ' <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: ', (int) 13 => ' <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." ', (int) 14 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 15 $i = (int) 7include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below.
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');}echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="731"> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83538/abbotsford"> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83898/benefactor"> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'adriatic', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'adriatic' $args = array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84055/adriatic' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'Jan', (int) 1 => '01', (int) 2 => '1880' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. ', (int) 7 => ' <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. ', (int) 8 => ' <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 9 => ' <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court ', (int) 10 => ' <p> <a> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> ', (int) 11 => ' <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: ', (int) 13 => ' <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." ', (int) 14 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 15 $i = (int) 8include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');}echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="731"> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83538/abbotsford"> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83898/benefactor"> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'adriatic', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'adriatic' $args = array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84055/adriatic' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'Jan', (int) 1 => '01', (int) 2 => '1880' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. ', (int) 7 => ' <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. ', (int) 8 => ' <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 9 => ' <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court ', (int) 10 => ' <p> <a> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> ', (int) 11 => ' <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: ', (int) 13 => ' <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." ', (int) 14 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 15 $i = (int) 9include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');}echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="731"> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83538/abbotsford"> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83898/benefactor"> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'adriatic', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'adriatic' $args = array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84055/adriatic' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'Jan', (int) 1 => '01', (int) 2 => '1880' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. ', (int) 7 => ' <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. ', (int) 8 => ' <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 9 => ' <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court ', (int) 10 => ' <p> <a> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> ', (int) 11 => ' <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: ', (int) 13 => ' <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." ', (int) 14 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 15 $i = (int) 10include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');}echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="731"> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83538/abbotsford"> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83898/benefactor"> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'adriatic', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'adriatic' $args = array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84055/adriatic' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'Jan', (int) 1 => '01', (int) 2 => '1880' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. ', (int) 7 => ' <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. ', (int) 8 => ' <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 9 => ' <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court ', (int) 10 => ' <p> <a> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> ', (int) 11 => ' <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: ', (int) 13 => ' <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." ', (int) 14 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 15 $i = (int) 11include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." The Abbotsford, 98 U. S. 440 ; The Benefactor, 102 U. S. 214 . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper.
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');}echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="731"> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83538/abbotsford"> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83898/benefactor"> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'adriatic', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'adriatic' $args = array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84055/adriatic' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'Jan', (int) 1 => '01', (int) 2 => '1880' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. ', (int) 7 => ' <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. ', (int) 8 => ' <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 9 => ' <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court ', (int) 10 => ' <p> <a> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> ', (int) 11 => ' <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: ', (int) 13 => ' <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." ', (int) 14 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 15 $i = (int) 12include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8:
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');}echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="731"> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83538/abbotsford"> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83898/benefactor"> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'adriatic', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'adriatic' $args = array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84055/adriatic' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'Jan', (int) 1 => '01', (int) 2 => '1880' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. ', (int) 7 => ' <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. ', (int) 8 => ' <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 9 => ' <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court ', (int) 10 => ' <p> <a> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> ', (int) 11 => ' <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: ', (int) 13 => ' <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." ', (int) 14 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 15 $i = (int) 13include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
"6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case."
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');}echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="731"> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83538/abbotsford"> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a href="/case/83898/benefactor"> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'adriatic', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'The Adriatic - Citation 84055 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '84055', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '103 U.S. 730', 'appellant' => 'The Adriatic', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'The Adriatic', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1880-01-01', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> </p> <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> </p> <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. </p> <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. </p> <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court </p> <p> <a> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> </p> <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. </p> <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: </p> <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => '', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/103/730/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'adriatic' $args = array( (int) 0 => '84055', (int) 1 => 'adriatic' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84055/adriatic' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'Jan', (int) 1 => '01', (int) 2 => '1880' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> The Adriatic - 103 U.S. 730 (1880) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court The Adriatic, 103 U.S. 730 (1880) </span> <p> <b> The Adriatic </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> 103 U.S. 730 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <em> APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED </em> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <em> STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK </em> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> The Court promulgates a rule declaring what matters the record shall contain in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the reviewing power of the court is limited to questions of law. ', (int) 7 => ' <p> Motion to strike from the transcript the depositions and oral testimony taken in the progress of the cause in the several courts below. ', (int) 8 => ' <p> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 9 => ' <p> Sec. 698 of the Revised Statutes provides that, upon the appeal of any cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, a transcript of the record shall be transmitted to this court "and copies of the proofs and of such entries and papers on file as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." While sec. 1 of the Act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77, 18 Stat., pt. 3, 315, limits the review by this Court of the judgments and decrees on the instance side of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the questions of law arising on the record and to such rulings of the court below excepted to at the time as may be presented by a bill of exceptions, and requires the court ', (int) 10 => ' <p> <a> Page 103 U. S. 731 </a> ', (int) 11 => ' <p> below to find the facts, no change has been made in the law prescribing what should be included in the transcript sent here on an appeal. For that reason, we will not order the testimony which has been sent up in this case to be stricken out. As under our repeated decisions the facts as found are conclusive on us, it is clear the testimony may not be "necessary on the hearing of the appeal." <em> The Abbotsford, </em> <span> <a> 98 U. S. 440 </a> </span> ; <em> The Benefactor, </em> <span> <a> 102 U. S. 214 </a> </span> . For this reason, it may with propriety by consent of counsel be omitted from the printed record. We will not, however, make any order in that behalf, but if it shall be unnecessarily printed against the wishes of either of the parties, we will, on the final determination of the case, give such directions in respect to costs as may seem proper. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> The section of the Revised Statutes referred to, however, requires only copies of such of the proofs to be sent up "as may be necessary on the hearing of the appeal." This gives us power to prescribe by rule what shall be done in cases where the act of 1875 applies. For the guidance hereafter of parties appealing, and the officers of the courts below in such a case, we therefore now promulgate the following as an additional paragraph, numbered 6, to Rule 8: ', (int) 13 => ' <p> "6. The record in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where under the requirements of law the facts have been found in the court below, and our power to review is limited to the determination of questions of law arising on the record, shall be confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon, the bills of exceptions, the final judgment or decree, and such interlocutory orders and decrees as may be necessary to a proper review of the case." ', (int) 14 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 15 $i = (int) 14include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109