United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment

Judgment:

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '79079',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
			'appellant' => 'United States',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br />
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="469">
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br />
<br />
</div>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Ortega',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'united-states-vs-ortega',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '79079',
		(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '79079',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
		'appellant' => 'United States',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Ortega',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'united-states-vs-ortega'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '79079',
	(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/79079/united-states-vs-ortega'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Jan',
	(int) 1 => '01',
	(int) 2 => '1826'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 ',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 ',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 ',
	(int) 17 => '
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 ',
	(int) 18 => '
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
',
	(int) 19 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 20
$i = (int) 0
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)

United States v. Ortega

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '79079',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
			'appellant' => 'United States',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br />
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="469">
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br />
<br />
</div>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Ortega',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'united-states-vs-ortega',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '79079',
		(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '79079',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
		'appellant' => 'United States',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Ortega',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'united-states-vs-ortega'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '79079',
	(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/79079/united-states-vs-ortega'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Jan',
	(int) 1 => '01',
	(int) 2 => '1826'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 ',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 ',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 ',
	(int) 17 => '
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 ',
	(int) 18 => '
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
',
	(int) 19 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 20
$i = (int) 1
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '79079',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
			'appellant' => 'United States',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br />
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="469">
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br />
<br />
</div>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Ortega',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'united-states-vs-ortega',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '79079',
		(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '79079',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
		'appellant' => 'United States',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Ortega',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'united-states-vs-ortega'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '79079',
	(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/79079/united-states-vs-ortega'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Jan',
	(int) 1 => '01',
	(int) 2 => '1826'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 ',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 ',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 ',
	(int) 17 => '
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 ',
	(int) 18 => '
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
',
	(int) 19 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 20
$i = (int) 2
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '79079',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
			'appellant' => 'United States',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br />
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="469">
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br />
<br />
</div>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Ortega',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'united-states-vs-ortega',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '79079',
		(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '79079',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
		'appellant' => 'United States',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Ortega',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'united-states-vs-ortega'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '79079',
	(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/79079/united-states-vs-ortega'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Jan',
	(int) 1 => '01',
	(int) 2 => '1826'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 ',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 ',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 ',
	(int) 17 => '
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 ',
	(int) 18 => '
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
',
	(int) 19 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 20
$i = (int) 3
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '79079',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
			'appellant' => 'United States',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br />
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="469">
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br />
<br />
</div>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Ortega',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'united-states-vs-ortega',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '79079',
		(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '79079',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
		'appellant' => 'United States',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Ortega',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'united-states-vs-ortega'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '79079',
	(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/79079/united-states-vs-ortega'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Jan',
	(int) 1 => '01',
	(int) 2 => '1826'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 ',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 ',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 ',
	(int) 17 => '
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 ',
	(int) 18 => '
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
',
	(int) 19 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 20
$i = (int) 4
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '79079',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
			'appellant' => 'United States',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br />
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="469">
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br />
<br />
</div>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Ortega',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'united-states-vs-ortega',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '79079',
		(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '79079',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
		'appellant' => 'United States',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Ortega',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'united-states-vs-ortega'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '79079',
	(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/79079/united-states-vs-ortega'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Jan',
	(int) 1 => '01',
	(int) 2 => '1826'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 ',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 ',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 ',
	(int) 17 => '
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 ',
	(int) 18 => '
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
',
	(int) 19 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 20
$i = (int) 5
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Syllabus

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '79079',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
			'appellant' => 'United States',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br />
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="469">
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br />
<br />
</div>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Ortega',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'united-states-vs-ortega',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '79079',
		(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '79079',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
		'appellant' => 'United States',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Ortega',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'united-states-vs-ortega'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '79079',
	(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/79079/united-states-vs-ortega'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Jan',
	(int) 1 => '01',
	(int) 2 => '1826'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 ',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 ',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 ',
	(int) 17 => '
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 ',
	(int) 18 => '
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
',
	(int) 19 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 20
$i = (int) 6
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '79079',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
			'appellant' => 'United States',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br />
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="469">
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br />
<br />
</div>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Ortega',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'united-states-vs-ortega',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '79079',
		(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '79079',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
		'appellant' => 'United States',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Ortega',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'united-states-vs-ortega'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '79079',
	(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/79079/united-states-vs-ortega'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Jan',
	(int) 1 => '01',
	(int) 2 => '1826'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 ',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 ',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 ',
	(int) 17 => '
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 ',
	(int) 18 => '
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
',
	(int) 19 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 20
$i = (int) 7
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '79079',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
			'appellant' => 'United States',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br />
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="469">
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br />
<br />
</div>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Ortega',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'united-states-vs-ortega',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '79079',
		(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '79079',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
		'appellant' => 'United States',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Ortega',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'united-states-vs-ortega'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '79079',
	(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/79079/united-states-vs-ortega'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Jan',
	(int) 1 => '01',
	(int) 2 => '1826'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 ',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 ',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 ',
	(int) 17 => '
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 ',
	(int) 18 => '
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
',
	(int) 19 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 20
$i = (int) 8
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Quaere whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '79079',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
			'appellant' => 'United States',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br />
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="469">
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br />
<br />
</div>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Ortega',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'united-states-vs-ortega',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '79079',
		(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '79079',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
		'appellant' => 'United States',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Ortega',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'united-states-vs-ortega'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '79079',
	(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/79079/united-states-vs-ortega'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Jan',
	(int) 1 => '01',
	(int) 2 => '1826'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 ',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 ',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 ',
	(int) 17 => '
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 ',
	(int) 18 => '
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
',
	(int) 19 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 20
$i = (int) 9
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '79079',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
			'appellant' => 'United States',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br />
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="469">
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br />
<br />
</div>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Ortega',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'united-states-vs-ortega',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '79079',
		(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '79079',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
		'appellant' => 'United States',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Ortega',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'united-states-vs-ortega'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '79079',
	(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/79079/united-states-vs-ortega'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Jan',
	(int) 1 => '01',
	(int) 2 => '1826'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 ',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 ',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 ',
	(int) 17 => '
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 ',
	(int) 18 => '
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
',
	(int) 19 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 20
$i = (int) 10
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '79079',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
			'appellant' => 'United States',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br />
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="469">
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br />
<br />
</div>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Ortega',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'united-states-vs-ortega',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '79079',
		(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '79079',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
		'appellant' => 'United States',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Ortega',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'united-states-vs-ortega'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '79079',
	(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/79079/united-states-vs-ortega'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Jan',
	(int) 1 => '01',
	(int) 2 => '1826'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 ',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 ',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 ',
	(int) 17 => '
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 ',
	(int) 18 => '
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
',
	(int) 19 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 20
$i = (int) 11
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

"that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '79079',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
			'appellant' => 'United States',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br />
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="469">
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br />
<br />
</div>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Ortega',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'united-states-vs-ortega',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '79079',
		(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '79079',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
		'appellant' => 'United States',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Ortega',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'united-states-vs-ortega'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '79079',
	(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/79079/united-states-vs-ortega'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Jan',
	(int) 1 => '01',
	(int) 2 => '1826'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 ',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 ',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 ',
	(int) 17 => '
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 ',
	(int) 18 => '
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
',
	(int) 19 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 20
$i = (int) 12
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '79079',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
			'appellant' => 'United States',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br />
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="469">
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br />
<br />
</div>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Ortega',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'united-states-vs-ortega',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '79079',
		(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '79079',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
		'appellant' => 'United States',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Ortega',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'united-states-vs-ortega'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '79079',
	(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/79079/united-states-vs-ortega'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Jan',
	(int) 1 => '01',
	(int) 2 => '1826'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 ',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 ',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 ',
	(int) 17 => '
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 ',
	(int) 18 => '
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
',
	(int) 19 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 20
$i = (int) 13
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '79079',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
			'appellant' => 'United States',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br />
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="469">
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br />
<br />
</div>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Ortega',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'united-states-vs-ortega',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '79079',
		(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '79079',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
		'appellant' => 'United States',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Ortega',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'united-states-vs-ortega'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '79079',
	(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/79079/united-states-vs-ortega'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Jan',
	(int) 1 => '01',
	(int) 2 => '1826'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 ',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 ',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 ',
	(int) 17 => '
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 ',
	(int) 18 => '
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
',
	(int) 19 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 20
$i = (int) 14
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '79079',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
			'appellant' => 'United States',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br />
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="469">
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br />
<br />
</div>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Ortega',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'united-states-vs-ortega',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '79079',
		(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '79079',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
		'appellant' => 'United States',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Ortega',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'united-states-vs-ortega'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '79079',
	(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/79079/united-states-vs-ortega'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Jan',
	(int) 1 => '01',
	(int) 2 => '1826'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 ',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 ',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 ',
	(int) 17 => '
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 ',
	(int) 18 => '
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
',
	(int) 19 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 20
$i = (int) 15
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Page 24 U. S. 469

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '79079',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
			'appellant' => 'United States',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br />
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="469">
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br />
<br />
</div>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Ortega',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'united-states-vs-ortega',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '79079',
		(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '79079',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
		'appellant' => 'United States',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Ortega',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'united-states-vs-ortega'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '79079',
	(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/79079/united-states-vs-ortega'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Jan',
	(int) 1 => '01',
	(int) 2 => '1826'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 ',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 ',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 ',
	(int) 17 => '
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 ',
	(int) 18 => '
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
',
	(int) 19 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 20
$i = (int) 16
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '79079',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
			'appellant' => 'United States',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br />
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="469">
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br />
<br />
</div>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Ortega',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'united-states-vs-ortega',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '79079',
		(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '79079',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
		'appellant' => 'United States',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Ortega',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'united-states-vs-ortega'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '79079',
	(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/79079/united-states-vs-ortega'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Jan',
	(int) 1 => '01',
	(int) 2 => '1826'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 ',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 ',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 ',
	(int) 17 => '
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 ',
	(int) 18 => '
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
',
	(int) 19 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 20
$i = (int) 17
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '79079',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
			'appellant' => 'United States',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br />
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="469">
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br />
<br />
</div>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Ortega',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'united-states-vs-ortega',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '79079',
		(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '79079',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
		'appellant' => 'United States',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Ortega',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'united-states-vs-ortega'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '79079',
	(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/79079/united-states-vs-ortega'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Jan',
	(int) 1 => '01',
	(int) 2 => '1826'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 ',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 ',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 ',
	(int) 17 => '
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 ',
	(int) 18 => '
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
',
	(int) 19 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 20
$i = (int) 18
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Certificate accordingly.

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '79079',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
			'appellant' => 'United States',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br />
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="469">
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br />
<br />
</div>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Ortega',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'united-states-vs-ortega',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '79079',
		(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'United States Vs Ortega - Citation 79079 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '79079',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '24 U.S. 467',
		'appellant' => 'United States',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'United States Vs. Ortega',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1826-01-01',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 </p>
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 </p>
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 </p>
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 </p>
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 </p>
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 </p>
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Ortega',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/24/467/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'united-states-vs-ortega'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '79079',
	(int) 1 => 'united-states-vs-ortega'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/79079/united-states-vs-ortega'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Jan',
	(int) 1 => '01',
	(int) 2 => '1826'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<div>


 United States v. Ortega - 24 U.S. 467 (1826)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 United States v. Ortega, 24 U.S. 11 Wheat. 467 467 (1826)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 United States v. Ortega
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 467
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<em>
 ON CERTIFICATE OF DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 </em>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
 An indictment under the crimes act of 1790, ch. 35, s. 37, for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of a foreign minister is not a case "affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution of the United States.
 ',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 The circuit courts have jurisdiction of such an offense under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
<em>
 Quaere
 </em>
 whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit court, in "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls" within the true construction of the second section of the third article of the Constitution
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 The defendant, Juan Gualberto de Ortega, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for infracting the law of nations by offering violence to the person of Hilario de Rivas y Salmon, the charge d'affaires of his Catholic Majesty the King of Spain in the United States contrary to the law of nations and to the act of the Congress of the United States in such case provided. The jury having found a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment and assigned for cause
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
 "that the circuit court has not jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, inasmuch as it is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister."
 ',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 The opinions of the judges of that court upon this point being opposed, the cause comes before this Court upon a certificate of such disagreement.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 The questions to which the point certified by the court below gives rise are first, whether this is a case affecting an ambassador or other public minister within the meaning of the second section of the third article of the Constitution of the United States. If it be, then the next question would be whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such cases is not only original, but exclusive of the circuit courts under the true construction of the above section and article.
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 The last question need not be decided in the present case, because the Court is clearly of
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 24 U. S. 469
 </a>
',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
 opinion that this is not a case affecting a public minister within the plain meaning of the Constitution. It is that of a public prosecution instituted and conducted by and in the name of the United States for the purpose of vindicating the law of nations and that of the United States, offended, as the indictment charges, in the person of a public minister by an assault committed on him by a private individual. It is a case, then, which affects the United States and the individual whom they seek to punish, but one in which the minister himself, although he was the person injured by the assault, has no concern, either in the event of the prosecution or in the costs attending it.
 ',
	(int) 17 => '
<p>
 It is ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that that court has jurisdiction of the matter charged in the indictment, the case not being one which affects an ambassador or other public minister.
 ',
	(int) 18 => '
<p>
<em>
 Certificate accordingly.
 </em>
',
	(int) 19 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 20
$i = (int) 19
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Court	US Supreme Court
Decided On	1826
Case Number	24 U.S. 467
Appellant	United States
Respondent	Ortega

United States Vs. Ortega - Court Judgment