Grubb'S Ex'Rs vs. Grubb'S Ex'Rs - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/78052
SubjectArbitration
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On1792
Case Number2 U.S. 191
AppellantGrubb'S Ex'Rs
RespondentGrubb'S Ex'Rs
Excerpt:
grubb's ex'rs v. grubb's ex'rs - 2 u.s. 191 (1792) u.s. supreme court grubb's ex'rs v. grubb's ex'rs, 2 u.s. 191 (1792) 2 u.s. 191 (dall.) grubb's executors v. grubb's executors supreme court of pennsylvania september term, 1792 this cause being referred in the common pleas, the referrees made report into office; and afterwards the plaintiff removed the cause by certiorari into this court. page 2 u.s. 191, 192 but ingersoll, on behalf of the defendant, now moved for a procedendo; alledging that in a case of pigot v. young, it had been decided, that a cause could not be removed after the arbitrators, or referees, had entered on the business submitted, or referred, to them. and the court, accordingly, awarded a procedendo.
Judgment:
GRUBB'S EX'RS v. GRUBB'S EX'RS - 2 U.S. 191 (1792)
U.S. Supreme Court GRUBB'S EX'RS v. GRUBB'S EX'RS, 2 U.S. 191 (1792)

2 U.S. 191 (Dall.)

Grubb's Executors
v.
Grubb's Executors

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

September Term, 1792

This cause being referred in the Common Pleas, the referrees made report into office; and afterwards the plaintiff removed the cause by certiorari into this Court.

Page 2 U.S. 191, 192

But Ingersoll, on behalf of the defendant, now moved for a Procedendo; alledging that in a case of Pigot v. Young, it had been decided, that a cause could not be removed after the arbitrators, or referees, had entered on the business submitted, or referred, to them.

And the Court, accordingly, awarded a Procedendo.