Nawab HussaIn Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/772996
SubjectCriminal
CourtRajasthan High Court
Decided OnJan-15-2002
Case NumberD.B. Cr. Writ Petition No. 877 of 2001
Judge N.N. Mathur and; D.N. Joshi, JJ.
Reported in2002(2)WLN21
AppellantNawab Hussain
RespondentState of Rajasthan and ors.
Cases ReferredOm Prakash v. State of Rajasthan.
Excerpt:
rajasthan prisoners release on parole rule, 1958 - rule 14(a)--parole--petitioner's prayer for parole has been rejected on the ground that he is resident of outside the state of rajasthan--respondent authorities are directed to consider the applicants case afresh in the light of judgment given in (d.b. criminal writ petition no. 167/2001 om prakash v. state of rajasthan).;writ petition partly allowed - n.n. mathur, j.1. this petition has been registered on the letter of applicant nawab hussain. his prayer for parole has been rejected on the ground that he is a resident of outside the state of rajasthan i.e., state of haryana.2. this aspect has been dealt with by us today i.e., on 15.01.2002 in d.b. criminal writ petition no. 167/2001 om prakash v. state of rajasthan.3. in view of the reasons and conclusion arrived at in the aforesaid special appeal, the petition filed by the appelicant nawab hussain is partly allowed. the respondent authorities are directed to consider the applicant's case afresh in the light of the aforesaid judgment.
Judgment:

N.N. Mathur, J.

1. This petition has been registered on the letter of applicant Nawab Hussain. His prayer for parole has been rejected on the ground that he is a resident of outside the State of Rajasthan i.e., State of Haryana.

2. This aspect has been dealt with by us today i.e., on 15.01.2002 in D.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 167/2001 Om Prakash v. State of Rajasthan.

3. In view of the reasons and conclusion arrived at in the aforesaid special appeal, the petition filed by the appelicant Nawab Hussain is partly allowed. The respondent authorities are directed to consider the applicant's case afresh in the light of the aforesaid judgment.