Manga Singh Vs. Narcotics Control Bureau Sub Zone Ranchi S N Tower Near Sidhu Kanhu Park Ranchi - Court Judgment

In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi W.P.(S) No.6806 of 2013 Krishna Singh…......................…Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and others....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ANANDA SEN For the Petitioner: Mr.Vikash Kumar For the State:

5. 05.8.16. On the request made by counsel for the petitioner, list this case in the next week. (Ananda Sen,J.) ND/ In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi W.P.(S) No.6777 of 2013 Pushpa Devi @ Pushpa Devya and another..…Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand and others.....................Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ANANDA SEN For the Petitioners: Mr.Anil Kumar Jha For the State : J.C. to A.A.G4 05.8.16. Counsel for the petitioners and counsel for the State both submits that the grievance of the petitioners has already been redressed. In view of such submission, this writ application is dismissed as infructuous. (Ananda Sen,J.) ND/ In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi W.P.(S) No.6697 of 2013 Chaita Munda..........................…...............Petitioner VERSUS M/s. Central Coalfields Limited and others..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ANANDA SEN For the Petitioner: Mr.Vikesh Kumar For the CCL :

4. 05.8.16. Let this case go out of my list so as to be listed before an appropriate Bench with the approval of Hon'ble the Chief Justice. (Ananda Sen,J.) ND/ In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi W.P.(S) No.6540 of 2013 Dropadi Mahato ...................…...............Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and others.............Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ANANDA SEN For the Petitioner: Mr.S. Mahto For the State :

5. 05.8.16. On the request made by counsel for the petitioner, put up this case after two weeks. (Ananda Sen,J.) ND/ In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi W.P.(S) No.5853 of 2013 Sharwan Kumar Tiwari...............…...Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and others.............Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ANANDA SEN For the Petitioner: Mr.Binod Kumar For the State : J.C. to G.P.I4 05.8.16. Counsel for the State prays for and is permitted three weeks' time to comply the order dated 15.4.2015. List this case after three weeks. (Ananda Sen,J.) ND/ In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi W.P.(S) No.5748 of 2013 Madhuri Devi and another............…...Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another..........Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ANANDA SEN For the Petitioner: Mr.Vikash Kumar For the State :Mr. Ram Nivas Roy 5/ 05.8.16. Counsel for the State is further directed to comply the order dated 30.3.2015 within three weeks. Let this matter be listed after three weeks. (Ananda Sen,J.) ND/ In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi W.P.(S) No.5571 of 2013 Sukra Bhuiyan .........................…...............Petitioner VERSUS M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited and others..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ANANDA SEN For the Petitioner: Mr.S.P.Sinha For the BCCL :

5. 05.8.16. Let this case go out of my list so as to be listed before an appropriate Bench with the approval of Hon'ble the Chief Justice. (Ananda Sen,J.) ND/ In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi W.P.(S) No.5581 of 2013 Ramawati Devi and another........................Petitioners VERSUS M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited and others..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ANANDA SEN For the Petitioner: Mr.S. Prasad For the BCCL :

7. 05.8.16. Let this case go out of my list so as to be listed before an appropriate Bench with the approval of Hon'ble the Chief Justice. (Ananda Sen,J.) ND/ In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi W.P.(S) No.5368 of 2013 Laxmi Kumari .........................................Petitioner VERSUS M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited& Ors...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ANANDA SEN For the Petitioner: Mr.S.P.Sinha For the BCCL :

4. 05.8.16. Let this case go out of my list so as to be listed before an appropriate Bench with the approval of Hon'ble the Chief Justice. (Ananda Sen,J.) ND/ In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi W.P.(S) No.5549 of 2013 Vishwanath Nonia........................................Petitioner VERSUS M/s. Central Coalfield Limited & Ors........Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ANANDA SEN For the Petitioner: Mr.Lalan Kumar Singh For the CCL :

16. 05.8.16. Let this case go out of my list so as to be listed before an appropriate Bench with the approval of Hon'ble the Chief Justice. (Ananda Sen,J.) ND/ In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi W.P.(S) No.5826 of 2013 Sunita Kumari....................................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and others............Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ANANDA SEN For the Petitioner: Mr.P.A.N.Roy For the State :

3. 05.8.16. Let this case go out of my list so as to be listed before an appropriate Bench with the approval of Hon'ble the Chief Justice. (Ananda Sen,J.) ND/ In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi W.P.(S) No.5307 of 2013 Rekha Kumari ...............................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and others............Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ANANDA SEN For the Petitioner: Mr.Rajan Sahay For the State :

3. 05.8.16. Two weeks' time, as prayed for, is granted to the petitioner to seek instruction in the matter. Put up this case after two weeks. (Ananda Sen,J.) ND/ In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi B.A.No.2465 of 2016 Sk.Zahirul and another..................Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand …..................Opposite Party CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ANANDA SEN For the Petitioners: Mr..H.P.Singh For the State : A.P.P8 05.8.16. Let the name of Sri Sudhir Kumar appear in the cause list as Special Public Prosecutor for N.C.B. The prayer sought for by the Special Public Prosecutor is granted. List this case in the next week. (Ananda Sen,J.) ND/ In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi B.A.No.2604 of 2016 Manga Singh …..........................Petitioner VERSUS Narcotics Control Bureau, Sub-Zone, Ranchi …..................Opposite Party CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ANANDA SEN For the Petitioner: Mr.S.P.Roy For the State : Mr.Pankaj Kumar,APP For the SPP : Mr. Sudhir Kumar 11/ 05.8.16. As prayed for, let this matter be listed in the next week to enable learned counsel appearing for Special Public Prosecutor for N.C.B to go through the Barachatti P.S. Case no.448 of 2015. The case diary of Barachatti P.S. Case no.448 of 2015 is handed over to the Special Public Prosecutor. List this case in the next week. (Ananda Sen,J.) ND/ In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi W.P.(S)No.4674 of 2016 Santosh Kumar Pathak, son of Late Gupteshwar Pathak, resident of Brahman Tola, Bundu, P.O. & P.S Bundu, Dist – Ranchi …..........................Petitioner VERSUS1 The Union of India through C.I.S.F2 Inspector General, Eastern Zone, C.I.S.F Head Quarters, Patna, P.O, P.S. and Dist – Patna 3. Deputy Inspector General, Eastern Zone, C.I.S.F. Head Quarters, Patna, P.O, P.S. and Dist – Patna...........................….........Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ANANDA SEN For the Petitioner : Mr.A.K.Sahani For the Union of India:Mr.Ashok Singh 03/ 05.8.16. The father of the petitioner, who was an employee of C.I.S.F, retired on 1.2.1990 on medical ground of invalidation. As per the C.I.S.F Circular No.21/2005/R&S dated 14.6.2005, the wife, son and daughter of personnel, who is medically invalid will be entitled to be appointed on compassionate ground. Since petitioner's father was retired on the ground of invalidation on 1.2.1990, the petitioner claims appointment on compassionate ground in terms of the said circular. From the record, it is apparent that the date of birth of the petitioner was 22.11.1988. The age of the petitioner on the date of retirement of his father was nearly 2 years. His father died on 20.5.1996, on that date also the petitioner was a minor and was aged about 8 years. Counsel for the petitioner submits that only after attaining majority, the petitioner had applied for grant of compassionate appointment which was rejected. It is admitted that father of the petitioner was retired on medical ground of invalidation on 1.2.1990. It is also admitted that father of the petitioner died on 20.5.1996. As per the admitted case of the petitioner, date of birth of the petitioner is 22.11.1988, which means the petitioner was 8 years approximately at the time of death of his father. The petitioner has relied upon Circular No.21/2005/R&S dated 14.6.2005. Clause (iii) of the said Circular reads as follows: (iii) Before, forwarding the application to the Zonal/ Plant, DIsG, all the information as stipulated in the application will be personally verified by the Unit Commander. The forwarding letter to the Zonal/ Plant DisG will be signed personally by the Unit Commander. All the documents to be, enclosed along with the forwarding letter will be signed and stamped by the Unit Commander and the stamp should bear his name and rank. Only in the absence of the Unit Commander, this proforma can be forwarded by another GO, after verifying all these documents and observing all these formalities. As per the said circular, dependent member if he is a minor at the time of death of the deceased is allowed to apply for compassionate appointment on attaining the age of 18 years, provided he is due to attain the required age limit within five years from the date of death of Government Servant. Applying the said rule, it is crystal clear that the petitioner did not attain the required age limit within five years from the date of death of the Government Servant. That being the admitted position, the petitioner was not eligible to apply for grant of compassionate appointment. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order is on different ground, i.e, the petitioner is not eligible because of his height which is lesser than the minimum requirement for appointment as a constable. The petitioner claims that he was not praying to be appointed as a constable but he was claimed to be appointed for 'follower' for which no physical criteria is required. Be whatever as it may, since as per clause (v), referred to above, itself the petitioner even not eligible to apply, it hardly against on what ground the case of the petitioner has been rejected. Further the petitioner has survived for nearly 21 years from the date of death of his father. I find no reason to entertain this writ application and hence, this writ application is dismissed. (Ananda Sen,J.) ND/ In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi W.P.(S) No.5873 of 2014 Dr.Ajit Kumar .............................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another.......Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ANANDA SEN For the Petitioner: Mr.Abhay Prakash For the State : Miss Jyoti Nayan, J.C to G.P.IV5 05.8.16. Respondent is directed to comply the order dated 16.6.2016 as the same has not yet been complied with. By way of last indulgence, list this matter on 12.8.2016 so that the order dated 16.6.2016 be complied with. (Ananda Sen,J.) ND/ In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi W.P.(S) No.5813 of 2014 Munia Devi ….................................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and others.......Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ANANDA SEN For the Petitioner: Mr.Mungal Lal Kumar Chitra For the State : J.C to Sr.S.C.II3 05.8.16. Counsel for the respondent no.8 is absent. List this case after two weeks to enable counsel for the State to file counter affidavit. (Ananda Sen,J.) ND/ In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi W.P.(S) No.5809 of 2014 Sunita Soren ….................................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and others.......Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ANANDA SEN For the Petitioner: Mr.Manoj Tandon For the State :Mr. Ram Nivas Roy 7/ 05.8.16. On the request made by counsel for the petitioner, list this case on 12.8.2016 (Ananda Sen,J.) ND/ In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi W.P.(S) No.5136 of 2014 Jugnu Mahli ….................................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another.....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ANANDA SEN For the Petitioner: None For the State :J.C. to A.A.G5 05.8.16. Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. Counsel for the State is present. List this case after four weeks. (Ananda Sen,J.) ND/