Abhiram Veer Vs. North Eastern Regional Agricultural Marketing Corporation Ltd. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/672398
SubjectCriminal
CourtSupreme Court of India
Decided OnSep-10-1999
Case NumberTransfer Petitions (Crl.) Nos. 200-09 of 1999
Judge K.T. Thomas and; M.B. Shah, JJ.
Reported in(2000)10SCC433
AppellantAbhiram Veer
RespondentNorth Eastern Regional Agricultural Marketing Corporation Ltd.
Excerpt:
- [k.t. thomas and; m.b. shah, jj.] - criminal procedure code, 1973 — section. 406 — transfer of cases — grounds for — transfer of cases under section. 138 of negotiable instruments act pending before courts at one place (guwahati in this case), held, could not be allowed merely because of the allegation that cause of action arose at another place (lucknow) and that only a court at that other place could exercise jurisdiction -- learned counsel then submitted the hardships inflicted on the petitioner for attending the criminal cases, pending before the courts in guwahati, particularly when all the 10 different cases are posted on different dates.  however, it is open to the petitioner to apply for personal exemption from appearance in cases where he made the first appearance. with these observations these transfer petitions are disposed of. court masters.k.t. thomas and; m.b. shah, jj.1. this petition for transfer of 10 cases under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act cannot be allowed on the ground specified in this petition (the ground shown is that the cause of action arose at lucknow, and therefore, only a court of lucknow can exercise jurisdiction). question of jurisdiction is a matter which the petitioner will have to raise before the court, where the case is now pending.2. learned counsel then submitted the hardships inflicted on the petitioner for attending the criminal cases, pending before the courts in guwahati, particularly when all the 10 different cases are posted on different dates. counsel points out the situation in guwahati poses danger to his life. we do not regard even those are sufficient for transferring the cases as that would apply to the other side also.3. however, it is open to the petitioner to apply for personal exemption from appearance in cases where he made the first appearance. if any such motion is made, we direct the magistrate concerned to exempt him from personal appearance on the following conditions:1. the counsel on his behalf would be present in the court on all days when the cases are taken up.2. the petitioner will not dispute his identity.3. the petitioner would be present in court when his presence is imperatively needed, such as, the examination under section 313 of the criminal procedure code.4. with these observations these transfer petitions are disposed of. court masters.
Judgment:

K.T. Thomas and; M.B. Shah, JJ.

1. This petition for transfer of 10 cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act cannot be allowed on the ground specified in this petition (the ground shown is that the cause of action arose at Lucknow, and therefore, only a court of Lucknow can exercise jurisdiction). Question of jurisdiction is a matter which the petitioner will have to raise before the Court, where the case is now pending.

2. Learned counsel then submitted the hardships inflicted on the petitioner for attending the criminal cases, pending before the courts in Guwahati, particularly when all the 10 different cases are posted on different dates. Counsel points out the situation in Guwahati poses danger to his life. We do not regard even those are sufficient for transferring the cases as that would apply to the other side also.

3. However, it is open to the petitioner to apply for personal exemption from appearance in cases where he made the first appearance. If any such motion is made, we direct the Magistrate concerned to exempt him from personal appearance on the following conditions:

1. The counsel on his behalf would be present in the court on all days when the cases are taken up.

2. The petitioner will not dispute his identity.

3. The petitioner would be present in court when his presence is imperatively needed, such as, the examination under Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

4. With these observations these transfer petitions are disposed of. Court Masters.