Karimjee P. Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax and anr. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/671434
SubjectDirect Taxation
CourtSupreme Court of India
Decided OnSep-09-2002
Judge Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri and; S.N. Variava, JJ.
Reported in[2004]271ITR564(SC)
ActsIncome Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80HHC
AppellantKarimjee P. Ltd.
RespondentDeputy Commissioner of Income-tax and anr.
Appellant Advocate J.D. Mistri and; Rustom B. Hathikhanawala, Advs
Respondent Advocate Mukul Rohatgi, Additional Solicitor-General, ; Ranbir Chandra and ;
DispositionAppeal allowed
Excerpt:
- - 3. the only reason for declining the relief to the assessee was the failure of compliance of the second proviso to section 80hhc of the income-tax act 1961. in respect of other requirements, there is no dispute that the assessee has complied with the same.order1. heard learned counsel for the parties.2. leave is granted.3. the only reason for declining the relief to the assessee was the failure of compliance of the second proviso to section 80hhc of the income-tax act 1961. in respect of other requirements, there is no dispute that the assessee has complied with the same.4. while the matter was being argued, we permitted learned counsel for the assessee to comply with the requirements of the said proviso and it is now represented that an amount equal to the amount of deduction claimed under the sub-section has been debited from the profit and loss account of the previous year relevant to the assessment year 1987-88 in respect of which the deduction was to be allowed and that the same was credited to a reserve account to be utilised for the purpose of the business of the assessee.5. in view of the compliance of the said proviso, the order under challenge is set aside and the assessee is held entitled to deduction under section 80hhc in the accounting year 1986-87.6. the civil appeal is, accordingly, allowed.7. no costs.
Judgment:
ORDER

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Leave is granted.

3. The only reason for declining the relief to the assessee was the failure of compliance of the second proviso to Section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act 1961. In respect of other requirements, there is no dispute that the assessee has complied with the same.

4. While the matter was being argued, we permitted learned counsel for the assessee to comply with the requirements of the said proviso and it is now represented that an amount equal to the amount of deduction claimed under the sub-section has been debited from the profit and loss account of the previous year relevant to the assessment year 1987-88 in respect of which the deduction was to be allowed and that the same was credited to a reserve account to be utilised for the purpose of the business of the assessee.

5. In view of the compliance of the said proviso, the order under challenge is set aside and the assessee is held entitled to deduction under Section 80HHC in the accounting year 1986-87.

6. The civil appeal is, accordingly, allowed.

7. No costs.