Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Kumar Engg. Corpn. and anr. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/635926
SubjectExcise
CourtPunjab and Haryana High Court
Decided OnMay-03-2002
Case Number CCES No. 10 of 2001
JudgeJawahar Lal Gupta and; N.K. Sud, JJ.
Reported in2002(82)ECC51
AppellantCommissioner of Central Excise
RespondentKumar Engg. Corpn. and anr.
Advocates:Mr. Rajesh Gumber
DispositionPetition dismissed
Excerpt:
central excise act, 1944;section 35h(1) - reference to high court--whether gate passes issued prior to 1.4.94 but endorsed after that date would fall under the coverage of entry no. 10 in the table to the notification no. 16/94-ce (nt) dated 30.3.94 and would consequently become eligible document for taking credit under the modvat scheme? - jawahar lal gupta, j.1. the revenue has filed this petition under section 35h(1) of the central excise act, 1944. it stated that the following question arises for the opinion of this court:whether gate passes issued prior to 1.4.94 but endorsed after that date would fall under the coverage of entry no. 10 in the table to the notification no. 16/94-ce (nt) dated 30.3.94 and would consequently become eligible document for taking credit under the modvat scheme?2. mr. rajesh gumber, learned counsel for the petitioner, very fairly states that the matter is concluded against the revenue by the judgment of the gujarat high court in commissioner of central excise, ahmedabad-i v. gujarat medicraft pvt. ltd. 2001 (75) ecc 256 (guj) reference application nos. 16, 26, 27/2000 decided on november 22, 2000. he further states that the decision has been accepted by the central board of excise and customs.3. in view of the statement of the counsel the question is answered against the revenue.4. the petition is dismissed in limine as no referable question of law arises for the opinion of this court.
Judgment:

Jawahar Lal Gupta, J.

1. The Revenue has filed this petition under Section 35H(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It stated that the following question arises for the opinion of this Court:

Whether gate passes issued prior to 1.4.94 but endorsed after that date would fall under the coverage of Entry No. 10 in the table to the Notification No. 16/94-CE (NT) dated 30.3.94 and would consequently become eligible document for taking credit under the Modvat scheme?

2. Mr. Rajesh Gumber, learned Counsel for the petitioner, very fairly states that the matter is concluded against the Revenue by the judgment of the Gujarat High Court in Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad-I v. Gujarat Medicraft Pvt. Ltd. 2001 (75) ECC 256 (Guj) Reference Application Nos. 16, 26, 27/2000 decided on November 22, 2000. He further states that the decision has been accepted by the Central Board of Excise and Customs.

3. In view of the statement of the counsel the question is answered against the Revenue.

4. The petition is dismissed in limine as no referable question of law arises for the opinion of this Court.