SooperKanoon Citation | sooperkanoon.com/44680 |
Court | Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT |
Decided On | Jan-25-2007 |
Judge | J T T.K. |
Reported in | (2007)(119)ECC292 |
Appellant | identity Advertising Associates |
Respondent | Commissioner of Central Excise |
2. The learned DR urged that the appellant had not taken registration for payment of service tax as required under the Finance Act and evaded tax liability for five years. As the longer period has been invoked he said that the imposition of penalty is justified.
3. I have gone through the records of the case carefully. The tax liability comes to Rs. 4.75 lakhs. When it was pointed out that tax has not been paid, the appellant discharged the duty liability along with interest even without waiting for the show cause notice. He has pleaded ignorance of service tax provisions. As this Tribunal has taken a consistent stand on the issue in the light of various decisions cited (supra) by the learned advocate, I allow the appeal by setting aside the penalty.