SooperKanoon Citation | sooperkanoon.com/331556 |
Subject | Civil |
Court | Mumbai |
Decided On | Nov-24-1887 |
Judge | Nanabhai Haridas and ;Jardine, JJ. |
Reported in | (1888)ILR12Bom235 |
Appellant | Balaji Lakshman |
Respondent | Dada Joti |
Nanabhai Haridas, J.
1. We are of opinion that the Subordinate Judge is right in holding that the last clause of Section 258 of the Civil Procedure Code (Act XIV of 1882) does not apply to this case. The payment of Rs. 38 by Balaji to Ganpatsing can be proved as a fact by the evidence of Ganpatsing supported by his receipt (exhibit 3) for such payment. See, Haji Abdul Rahiman v. Khoja Khaki Aruth I.L.R., 11 Bom. 13. The Subordinate Judge to be informed accordingly.