Podar S.R. Mills Vs. Comissioner of Central Excise, - Court Judgment

Excerpt:
1. none has come present on behalf of the appellants. notice for today's hearing of stay application , was sent to the appellants by registered post on 14.11.2000, but no response has been received from them. therefore the stay application of the appellants is ordered to be dismissed for want of prosecution. the appellants are directed to deposit the entire duty amount within six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order failing which their appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to them, under section 35 of the act. to come up for reporting compliance on 7.2.2001.

Judgment:
1. None has come present on behalf of the appellants. Notice for today's hearing of stay application , was sent to the appellants by registered post on 14.11.2000, but no response has been received from them. Therefore the stay application of the appellants is ordered to be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appellants are directed to deposit the entire duty amount within six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order failing which their appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to them, under Section 35 of the Act. To come up for reporting compliance on 7.2.2001.