Omana vs State - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1919788
CourtKerala Orders High Court
Decided OnDec-18-2019
Case NumberRSA/342/2007
JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice P.Somarajan
AppellantOMANA
RespondentSTATE
Excerpt:
in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.somarajan wednesday, the 18th day of december 2019 / 27th agrahayana, 1941 against the judgment and decree in as 67/2005 dated 25-11-2006 of sub court,kottarakkara against the judgment and decree in os 130/2001 dated 20-12-2004 of munsiff court,punalur appellants/appellants/plaintiffs: 1 omana, w/o. k.c. gopalan, aged 55, residing at plamoottil veedu, 2 k.c.gopalan, s/o.chennan, residing at plamoottil veedu, by advs. sri.p.haridas smt.deepa g. pal respondents/respondents/defendants: 1 kerala state represented by the district collector, kollam. 2 the chief conservator of forest, thiruvananthapuram. 3 the divisional forest officer 4 the forest range officer by government pleader this regular second appeal having been finally heard on 18.12.2019, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentthe appellants and the counsel remained absent. there was no representation. the appeal is of the year 2007. as such, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. sd/- p.somarajan judge spv //true copy// pa to judge
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 27TH AGRAHAYANA, 1941 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN AS 67/2005 DATED 25-11-2006 OF SUB COURT,KOTTARAKKARA AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN OS 130/2001 DATED 20-12-2004 OF MUNSIFF COURT,PUNALUR APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS: 1 OMANA, W/O. K.C. GOPALAN, AGED 55, RESIDING AT PLAMOOTTIL VEEDU, 2 K.C.GOPALAN, S/O.CHENNAN, RESIDING AT PLAMOOTTIL VEEDU, BY ADVS. SRI.P.HARIDAS SMT.DEEPA G. PAL RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS: 1 KERALA STATE REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM. 2 THE CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3 THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER 4 THE FOREST RANGE OFFICER BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18.12.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

The appellants and the counsel remained absent. There was no representation. The appeal is of the year 2007. As such, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE SPV //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE