Ashok Kumar vs Seema - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1882823
CourtKerala Orders High Court
Decided OnOct-29-2019
Case NumberMat.Appeal/659/2018
JudgeHonourable Mr.Justice K.Harilal,Honourable Mrs. Justice Annie John
AppellantAshok Kumar
RespondentSEEMA
Excerpt:
in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice k.harilal & the honourable mrs. justice annie john tuesday, the 29th day of october 2019 / 7th karthika, 1941 against the comon judgment dated 16-03-2018 in o.p.no.830/2015 of family court, kottarakkara appellant/ petitioner :ashok kumar, aged 43 years, s/o.ramachandran nair, ashok bhavan, njarakkadu muri, thalvoor village, pathanapuram taluk, kollam district by advs. sri.subhash cyriac smtsheeba joseph sri.s.sreejith (s-3453) respondent/ respondent : seema, aged 38 years, w/o.ashok kumar, chakku vally padinjatethil, thamarakudy muri, mylom village, kottarakkara taluk, kollam district - 691 506 r1 by adv. sri.k.v.anil kumar this matrimonial appeal having been finally heard on 29.10.2019, the court on the same day delivered the following :judgmentk.harilal, j.the appellant filed a memo stating that this appeal is not pressed. hence, this mat. appeal would stand dismissed as not pressed. k.harilal, judge annie john, judge rkm
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANNIE JOHN TUESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2019 / 7TH KARTHIKA, 1941 AGAINST THE COMON JUDGMENT DATED 16-03-2018 IN O.P.NO.830/2015 OF FAMILY COURT, KOTTARAKKARA APPELLANT/ PETITIONER :

ASHOK KUMAR, AGED 43 YEARS, S/O.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, ASHOK BHAVAN, NJARAKKADU MURI, THALVOOR VILLAGE, PATHANAPURAM TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT BY ADVS. SRI.SUBHASH CYRIAC SMTSHEEBA JOSEPH SRI.S.SREEJITH (S-3453) RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT : SEEMA, AGED 38 YEARS, W/O.ASHOK KUMAR, CHAKKU VALLY PADINJATETHIL, THAMARAKUDY MURI, MYLOM VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT - 691 506 R1 BY ADV. SRI.K.V.ANIL KUMAR THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29.10.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING :

JUDGMENT

K.Harilal, J.

The appellant filed a memo stating that this appeal is not pressed. Hence, this Mat. Appeal would stand dismissed as not pressed. K.HARILAL, JUDGE ANNIE JOHN, JUDGE RKM