Padmakumar vs Authorised Officer - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1854979
CourtKerala Orders High Court
Decided OnJan-28-2019
Case NumberWP(C)/2004/2019
JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice Devan Ramachandran
AppellantPadmakumar
RespondentAuthorised Officer
Excerpt:
in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice devan ramachandran monday, the 28th day of january 2019 / 8th magha, 1940 wp(c).no. 2004 of 2019 petitioner: padmakumar, aged 51 years s/o.raghavan unnithan, 13/151, jyothi vihar, maruthoruvattom p.o., cherthala, alappuzha - 688 539. by adv. sri.s.sunil kumar (palakkad) respondents: 1 authorised officer, karur vysya bank limited, ernakulam divisional office, 2nd floor, k.c.centre, kacheripady, ernakulam - 682 018. 2 the manager, karur vysya bank limited, tripunithura branch, s.n.junction, tripunithura, ernakulam - 682 301. sri. p.s.george-sc this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 28.01.2019, the court on the same day delivered the following: wpc 2004/19 2judgmentthe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition. permission is granted. accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as having been withdrawn. sd/- devan ramachandran, judge stu
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 8TH MAGHA, 1940 WP(C).No. 2004 of 2019 PETITIONER: PADMAKUMAR, AGED 51 YEARS S/O.RAGHAVAN UNNITHAN, 13/151, JYOTHI VIHAR, MARUTHORUVATTOM P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA - 688 539. BY ADV. SRI.S.SUNIL KUMAR (PALAKKAD) RESPONDENTS: 1 AUTHORISED OFFICER, KARUR VYSYA BANK LIMITED, ERNAKULAM DIVISIONAL OFFICE, 2ND FLOOR, K.C.CENTRE, KACHERIPADY, ERNAKULAM - 682 018. 2 THE MANAGER, KARUR VYSYA BANK LIMITED, TRIPUNITHURA BRANCH, S.N.JUNCTION, TRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM - 682 301. SRI. P.S.GEORGE-SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.01.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC 2004/19 2

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition. Permission is granted. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as having been withdrawn. Sd/- Devan Ramachandran, Judge stu