C. Ramesh Vs C. Murugesan - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1811200
CourtChennai Orders High Court
Decided OnDec-18-2025
Case NumberCMP/6090/2024
JudgeHonourable Mr.Justice V. Lakshminarayanan
AppellantC. Ramesh
RespondentC. Murugesan
Excerpt:
in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 18-12-2025coramthe honourable mr.justice v. lakshminarayanan in sa no. 1034 of 20071. c. ramesh2. c.suresh ...petitioners vs.1. c. murugesan c.kumarasamy (died)2. p. mayilsamy3. seerammal4. k.pushapavathi5. k.dinesh6. s.malathi ..respondents /proposed respondents prayer:- to bring on record the proposed respondents no.4 to 6 namely4. k. pushpavathi, 5. k. dinesh and 6. s. malathi as the legal representatives of the decease 2nd respondent c. kumarasamy and rank them as the respondents no.5 to 7 in the above sa no.1034 of 2007. for petitioners: mr.c.ramaraj for mr.m.guruprasad for respondent(s): mr.v.s.kesavan for r4 to r6orderheard the learned counsel for both sides.2. i am satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit. this civil miscellaneous petition is ordered.3. the registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in the second appeal. 18-12-2025 macv. lakshminarayanan, j.in sa no. 1034 of 2007 18.12.2025
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 18-12-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN in SA No. 1034 of 2007

1. C. Ramesh

2. C.Suresh ...Petitioners Vs.

1. C. Murugesan C.Kumarasamy (Died)

2. P. Mayilsamy

3. Seerammal

4. K.Pushapavathi

5. K.Dinesh

6. S.Malathi ..Respondents /Proposed Respondents PRAYER:- To bring on record the Proposed Respondents No.4 to 6 namely

4. K. Pushpavathi, 5. K. Dinesh and 6. S. Malathi as the legal representatives of the decease 2nd respondent C. Kumarasamy and rank them as the respondents No.5 to 7 in the above SA No.1034 of 2007. For Petitioners: Mr.C.Ramaraj for Mr.M.Guruprasad For Respondent(s): Mr.V.S.Kesavan for R4 to R6

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for both sides.

2. I am satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit. This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.

3. The Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in the Second Appeal. 18-12-2025 Mac

V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.

in SA No. 1034 of 2007 18.12.2025