Thomas V Thomas vs Deepa Sajeev - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1785542
CourtKerala High Court
Decided OnOct-16-2020
Case NumberRFA/470/2013
JudgeHonourable Mr.Justice T.V.Anilkumar
AppellantThomas V Thomas
RespondentDeepa Sajeev
Excerpt:
ia/3/2020 in rfa 470/2013 1/2in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent: the honourable mr.justice t.v.anilkumar wednesday,the 17th day of march 2021/26th phalguna, 1942 ia/3/2020 in rfa 470/2013 os no.261/2008 of the sub court, mavelikkara appellant/ 2nd respondent the divisional manager i.o.c., panampilly nagar, cochin- 682016. respondents/ appellants & 1st respondent1. thomas v thomas, s/o. thomas, aged 63 years, veloor house, puthukundam muri, karthikappally village, karthikappally taluk, alappuzha district.2. esther thomas,aged 50 years, w/o. thomas v. thomas, veloor house, puthukundam muri, karthikappally village, karthikappally taluk, alappuzha district.3. sujith thomas,aged 49 years s/o. thomas, veloor house, puthukundam muri, karthikappally village, karthikappally taluk, alappuzha district.4. deepa sajeev, aged 45 years,w/o. sajeev, residing at kadakkal peedikayil house, ala village, chengannur taluk, poomala.p.o- 688011. application praying that in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filed therewith the high court be pleased to extend the time for complying with the directions in the judgment dated 16/10/2020 by a further period of 2 months from today to meet the ends of justice. this application coming on for orders upon perusing the applicationand the affidavit filed in support thereof, and this court's judgmentdated 16-10-2020 and upon hearing the arguments of smt. thushara james t, advocate for the petitioner/ r2 in rfa, and of adv. paul k.varghese, for r1 to r3/ a1 to a3 in rfa, & adv. b.premnath, for r4/ r1 in rfa, the court passed the followingo r d e rthe second respondent in the appeal has sought two months' time to vacate the premises. time sought for is granted. no further extension will be allowed. 17-03-2021 t.v.anilkumar,judge /true copy/ ia/3/2020 in rfa 470/2013 2/2 assistant registrar
Judgment:

IA/3/2020 IN RFA 470/2013 1/2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Present: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.V.ANILKUMAR Wednesday,the 17th day of March 2021/26th Phalguna, 1942 IA/3/2020 IN RFA 470/2013 OS No.261/2008 of the SUB COURT, MAVELIKKARA APPELLANT/ 2nd RESPONDENT THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER I.O.C., PANAMPILLY NAGAR, COCHIN- 682016. RESPONDENTS/ APPELLANTS & 1st RESPONDENT

1. THOMAS V THOMAS, S/O. THOMAS, AGED 63 YEARS, VELOOR HOUSE, PUTHUKUNDAM MURI, KARTHIKAPPALLY VILLAGE, KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.

2. ESTHER THOMAS,AGED 50 YEARS, W/O. THOMAS V. THOMAS, VELOOR HOUSE, PUTHUKUNDAM MURI, KARTHIKAPPALLY VILLAGE, KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.

3. SUJITH THOMAS,AGED 49 YEARS S/O. THOMAS, VELOOR HOUSE, PUTHUKUNDAM MURI, KARTHIKAPPALLY VILLAGE, KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.

4. DEEPA SAJEEV, AGED 45 YEARS,

W/O. SAJEEV, RESIDING AT KADAKKAL PEEDIKAYIL HOUSE, ALA VILLAGE, CHENGANNUR TALUK, POOMALA.P.O- 688011. Application praying that in the circumstances stated in the

affidavit filed therewith the High Court be pleased to extend the time for complying with the directions in the judgment dated 16/10/2020 by a further period of 2 months from today to meet the ends of justice. This application coming on for orders upon perusing the application

and the affidavit filed in support thereof, and this court's judgment

dated 16-10-2020 and upon hearing the arguments of Smt. THUSHARA JAMES T, Advocate for the petitioner/ R2 in RFA, and of Adv. PAUL K.VARGHESE, for R1 to R3/ A1 To A3 in RFA, & Adv. B.PREMNATH, for R4/ R1 in RFA, the court passed the following

O R D E R

The second respondent in the appeal has sought two months' time to vacate the premises. Time sought for is granted. No further extension will be allowed. 17-03-2021 T.V.ANILKUMAR,JUDGE /true copy/ IA/3/2020 IN RFA 470/2013 2/2 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR