Mani vs T.Vanitha - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1779285
CourtChennai High Court
Decided OnApr-30-2025
Case NumberCMP/6985/2025
JudgeHonourable Mr Justice S. Sounthar
AppellantMANI
RespondentT.Vanitha
Excerpt:
cmp no.6985 of 2025 in cma sr no.21006 of 2025s.sounthar, j.notice to the first respondent already dispensed with. though private notice was served to the 2nd respondent and its name appear in the cause list, there is no representation on behalf of the 2nd respondent. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed along with the petition the delay of 915 days in filing the appeal is condoned. it is made clear that petitioner is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 915 days on the enhanced award amount, in case of her success in the appeal. registry is directed to number the civilmiscellaneous appeal, if it is otherwise in orderand list the same for admission. 30.04.2025 mst https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Judgment:

CMP No.6985 of 2025 in CMA SR No.21006 of 2025

S.SOUNTHAR, J.

Notice to the first respondent already dispensed with. Though private notice was served to the 2nd respondent and its name appear in the cause list, there is no representation on behalf of the 2nd respondent. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed along with the petition the delay of 915 days in filing the appeal is condoned. It is made clear that petitioner is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 915 days on the enhanced award amount, in case of her success in the appeal. Registry is directed to number the civil

miscellaneous appeal, if it is otherwise in order

and list the same for admission. 30.04.2025 mst https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis