| SooperKanoon Citation | sooperkanoon.com/1753629 |
| Court | Karnataka Orders High Court |
| Decided On | Apr-01-2025 |
| Case Number | WP/24373/2024 |
| Judge | N S Sanjay Gowda |
| Appellant | Smt Jayapadma |
| Respondent | The State of Karnataka |
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 24373 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
1. SMT JAYAPADMA W/O LATE M BALASUNDARM AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS
2. SMT VASUDHA B D/O LATE M BALASUNDARM AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
3. VISHNU PRASAD B S/O LATE M BALASUNDARM AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
4. SUBHADRA B
D/O LATE M BALASUNDARM AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS Digitally 5. MADHAVAPRASAD B signed by KIRAN S/O LATE M BALASUNDARM KUMAR R Location: AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 6. SMT SHARDAMMA W/O LATE M JANARDHANA AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS
7. SMT SHYLAJA J D/O LATE M JANARDHANA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
8. SRIHARI J S/O LATE M JANARDHANA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS -2-
9. KESHAVA J S/O LATE M JANARDHANA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
10. SMT INDIRAMMA D/O M C MUNISHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS
11. SMT M SUNANDA W/O LATE RAVICHANDRA M AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS
12. ARAVINDA MADHUSUDHANR S/O LATE RAVICHANDRA M AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
13. AJAY R S/O LATE RAVICHANDRA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO 161, SHUBHODAYA, 5TH CROSS ROAD, MINIRATHNAM NAIDU LANE, SIR M V LAYOUT HOSKOTE TOWN BENGALURU - 562114 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. GIREESHA KODGI., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING BENGALURU - 560001
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT BEERADENAHALLI, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562110. -3-
3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPUR SUB DIVISION DODDABALLAPUR - 561203
4. THE TAHASILDAR
OFFICE OF THE TAHSILDHAR HOSAKOTE HOSAKOTE TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V.SHIVA REDDY., AGA FOR R-1 TO R-4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASHING THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN RP 115/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE R-2 AS PER ANNEXURE-L, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA
1. The petitioners are challenging the grant of an
interim order by the Deputy Commissioner and are also questioning the justification for entertaining the proceedings under Section 136(3) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act. -4-
2. In my view, there is no justification to entertain this writ petition against the grant of an interim order by the Deputy Commissioner.
3. If the Deputy Commissioner, on the information
received, has decided to invoke his powers under Section 136(3) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, the same cannot be scuttled at the instance of the petitioners on the ground that there is no justification for the entry. The Deputy Commissioner has the statutory right to examine the entries and see if they are regularly made in accordance with law.
4. I am therefore of the view that there is no justification for entertaining this writ petition. This writ petition is therefore dismissed.
5. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to raise all such contentions that are available to them before the Deputy Commissioner in the pending revision. -5-
6. In view of the disposal of the petition, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE GSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7