Senthilkumar vs Subramanian - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1706364
CourtChennai High Court
Decided OnMar-14-2025
Case NumberCMP/3380/2025
JudgeHonourable Mr Justice S. Sounthar
AppellantSenthilkumar
RespondentSubramanian
Excerpt:
cmp no.3380 of 2025 in cma sr no.1886 of 2025s.sounthar, j.respondents 1 to 3 remained exparte before the tribunal and hence, notice to them is dispensed with. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the fourth respondent. being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed along with the petition, the delay of 537 days in filing the appeal is condoned. petitioners are not entitled to claim interest for the above said delay period. registry is directed to number the civil miscellaneous appeal, if it is otherwise in order and list the same for admission. registry is directed to print the name of mr.d.bhaskaran, counsel for the fourth respondent at the time of admission.14.03.2025 mst https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Judgment:

CMP No.3380 of 2025 in CMA SR No.1886 of 2025

S.SOUNTHAR, J.

Respondents 1 to 3 remained exparte before the Tribunal and hence, notice to them is dispensed with. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the fourth respondent. Being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed along with the petition, the delay of 537 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Petitioners are not entitled to claim interest for the above said delay period. Registry is directed to number the civil miscellaneous appeal, if it is otherwise in order and list the same for admission. Registry is directed to print the name of Mr.D.Bhaskaran, counsel for the fourth respondent at the time of admission.

14.03.2025 mst https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis