SooperKanoon Citation | sooperkanoon.com/16637 |
Court | Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi |
Decided On | Sep-01-1999 |
Reported in | (1999)(114)ELT716TriDel |
Appellant | Commissioner of C. Ex. |
Respondent | Rollatainers Ltd. |
3. The learned JDR, Shri Y.R. Kilania is present for the appellant-Revenue. No representation for the respondents inspite of service of notice of hearing.
4. The learned JDR submits that the question whether power cable is capital goods for the purpose of Modvat benefit under Rule 57Q ibid stands settled with the decision of the Larger Bench of the Tribunal in the case of jawahar Mills Limited v. C.C.E., Coimbatore [1999 (32) R.L.T 379 (CEGAT-LARGER BENCH)], according to which the said item falls under the category of capital goods for the purpose of Rule 57Q ibid.
The learned JDR fairly concedes that the other item, namely, hoist which falls in the larger category of material-handling equipments would also attract Rule 57Q as capital goods in the light of the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Jawahar Mills Ltd. 5. Thus both the items involved in the present appeal having been held to be 'capital goods' under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, the Re- spondents are entitled to avail themselves of credit of the duty paid on the said goods as capital goods under Rule 57Q ibid. Therefore, the Revenue's appeal fails and the same is accordingly dismissed.