Ranjith vs Jayanthi - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1661372
CourtKerala Orders High Court
Decided OnNov-29-2021
Case NumberRPFC/342/2016
JudgeHonourable Mr.Justice Basant Balaji
AppellantRanjith
RespondentJayanthi
Excerpt:
in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice basant balaji monday, the 29th day of november 2021 / 8th agrahayana, 1943 (against the judgment dated 29.02.2016 in m.c.no.56/2013 of family court palakkad) revision petitioner/counter petitioner: ranjith, aged 33 years, s/o.balachandran, 3/2a, thiruveedhiyamman kovil street, iranavoor, chennai-600 057. by adv. sri.p.k.mohanan(palakkad) respondents/petitioners: 1 jayanthi, aged 31 years,d/o.balakrishnan,'suvidham', vazhukkappara house, kinavallur, parli(po), palakkad district, pin-678 612. 2 samvrudh, aged 4 years, (minor) s/o.jayanthi, (2nd respondent represented by mother, the first respondent). this rev.petition(family court) having come up for admission on 29.11.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following:order(dated: 29th november, 2021) ------------------------- the counsel for the revision petitioner submits that he does not wish to proceed with the matter and hence the same may be dismissed as not pressed. recording the submission of the learned counsel for the revision petitioner, r.p.(f.c.) is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- basant balaji, judge ss
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI MONDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 8TH AGRAHAYANA, 1943 (AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 29.02.2016 IN M.C.No.56/2013 OF FAMILY COURT PALAKKAD) REVISION PETITIONER/COUNTER PETITIONER: RANJITH, AGED 33 YEARS, S/O.BALACHANDRAN, 3/2A, THIRUVEEDHIYAMMAN KOVIL STREET, IRANAVOOR, CHENNAI-600 057. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.MOHANAN(PALAKKAD) RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS: 1 JAYANTHI, AGED 31 YEARS,

D/O.BALAKRISHNAN,'SUVIDHAM', VAZHUKKAPPARA HOUSE, KINAVALLUR, PARLI(PO), PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN-678 612. 2 SAMVRUDH, AGED 4 YEARS, (MINOR) S/O.JAYANTHI, (2ND RESPONDENT REPRESENTED BY MOTHER, THE FIRST RESPONDENT). THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

(Dated: 29th November, 2021) ------------------------- The counsel for the revision petitioner submits that he does not wish to proceed with the matter and hence the same may be dismissed as not pressed. Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the revision petitioner, R.P.(F.C.) is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- BASANT BALAJI, JUDGE ss