Chandran vs Sethumadhavan - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1642280
CourtKerala Orders High Court
Decided OnJan-27-2021
Case NumberRSA/655/2006
JudgeHonourable Mr.Justice N.Anil Kumar
AppellantChandran
RespondentSethumadhavan
Excerpt:
in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice n.anil kumar wednesday, the 27th day of january 2021 / 7th magha, 1942 against the judgment in a.s.no.84/2000 dated 12-08-2005 on the files of the ii addl. district court, palakkad against the judgment in o.s.no.402/1997 dated 30-10-1999 on the files of munsiff court, chittur appellants/respondents/defendants:1 chandran aged 42 years,s/o.krishnan, kallankotti, chathamangalam, nemmara village,, 2 vasudevan, s/o.andi, aged 48 years ozhavappadam, chathamangalam, nemmara village,, 3 pazhanimala, s/o.ponnan, aged 61 years s/o.ponnan, kallankottil kunnil, nemmara village, 4 babu, aged 37 years son in law of 3rd defendant, residing at - do - 5 radhakrishnan, s/o.velayudhan, aged 36 years, kallankottil, nemmara village, 6 prabhakaran @ prabha s/o.radhakrishnan, aged 28 years, residing at -do-7 kumaran, s/o.kalyani, aged 41 years residing at -do- by advs. smt.a.s.suvitha sri.k.r.haran respondent/appellant/plaintiff: sethumadhavan, s/o.krishnan, aged 52 years, kallankottil,chatttamangalam, nemmara village, by adv. sri.vinod kumar.c this regular second appeal having been finally heard on 27.01.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdated this the 27th day of january 2021 the learned counsel for the appellants filed a withdrawal memo before this court stating that the appeal is not pressed. recording the memo, the suit is dismissed as withdrawn. there will be no order as to costs. pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. sd/- n.anil kumar judge dk
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANIL KUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 7TH MAGHA, 1942 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN A.S.NO.84/2000 DATED 12-08-2005 ON THE FILES OF THE II ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, PALAKKAD AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN O.S.NO.402/1997 DATED 30-10-1999 ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT, CHITTUR APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:

1 CHANDRAN AGED 42 YEARS,S/O.KRISHNAN, KALLANKOTTI, CHATHAMANGALAM, NEMMARA VILLAGE,, 2 VASUDEVAN, S/O.ANDI, AGED 48 YEARS OZHAVAPPADAM, CHATHAMANGALAM, NEMMARA VILLAGE,, 3 PAZHANIMALA, S/O.PONNAN, AGED 61 YEARS S/O.PONNAN, KALLANKOTTIL KUNNIL, NEMMARA VILLAGE, 4 BABU, AGED 37 YEARS SON IN LAW OF 3RD DEFENDANT, RESIDING AT - DO - 5 RADHAKRISHNAN, S/O.VELAYUDHAN, AGED 36 YEARS, KALLANKOTTIL, NEMMARA VILLAGE, 6 PRABHAKARAN @ PRABHA S/O.RADHAKRISHNAN, AGED 28 YEARS, RESIDING AT -DO-

7 KUMARAN, S/O.KALYANI, AGED 41 YEARS RESIDING AT -DO- BY ADVS. SMT.A.S.SUVITHA SRI.K.R.HARAN RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF: SETHUMADHAVAN, S/O.KRISHNAN, AGED 52 YEARS, KALLANKOTTIL,CHATTTAMANGALAM, NEMMARA VILLAGE, BY ADV. SRI.VINOD KUMAR.C THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 27th day of January 2021 The learned counsel for the appellants filed a withdrawal memo before this Court stating that the appeal is not pressed. Recording the memo, the suit is dismissed as withdrawn. There will be no order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- N.ANIL KUMAR JUDGE DK