Prasad K. vs Deepika - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1636229
CourtKerala Orders High Court
Decided OnApr-30-2021
Case NumberOP (FC)/295/2021
JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice Devan Ramachandran,Honourable Mrs. Justice M.R.Anitha
AppellantPrasad K.
RespondentDeepika
Excerpt:
in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice devan ramachandran & the honourable mrs. justice m.r.anitha friday, the 30th day of april 2021 / 10th vaisakha, 1943 against the order/judgment in op(hm) 686/2018 of family court, malappuram petitioner/respondent: prasad k., aged 46 years s/o. gangadharan nair, kakkattil house, pang-chendi p.o. perinthalmanna taluk, malappuram 679 338. by adv. sri.t.g.rajendran respondent/petitioner: deepika, aged 31 years d/o. gopalan nair, mundath house, chemmalassery p.o. perinthalmanna taluk, malappuram district 679 323. this op (family court) having come up for admission on 30.04.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdated this the 30th day of april 2021 the learned counsel for the petitioner says that ext.p2 application has already been disposed of by the trial court pending this lis and therefore, that no further orders are required. this original petition is, therefore, dismissed as being not pressed. sd/- devan ramachandran sd/- m.r.anitha stu
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.R.ANITHA FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 10TH VAISAKHA, 1943 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP(HM) 686/2018 OF FAMILY COURT, MALAPPURAM PETITIONER/RESPONDENT: PRASAD K., AGED 46 YEARS S/O. GANGADHARAN NAIR, KAKKATTIL HOUSE, PANG-CHENDI P.O. PERINTHALMANNA TALUK, MALAPPURAM 679 338. BY ADV. SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENT/PETITIONER: DEEPIKA, AGED 31 YEARS D/O. GOPALAN NAIR, MUNDATH HOUSE, CHEMMALASSERY P.O. PERINTHALMANNA TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 679 323. THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 30th day of April 2021 The learned counsel for the petitioner says that Ext.P2 application has already been disposed of by the Trial Court pending this lis and therefore, that no further orders are required. This original petition is, therefore, dismissed as being not pressed. Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN Sd/- M.R.ANITHA Stu