Rajesh vs State of Kerala - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1613402
CourtKerala Orders High Court
Decided OnApr-07-2021
Case NumberBail Appl./2156/2021
JudgeHonourable Mrs. Justice Shircy V.
AppellantRajesh
RespondentState of Kerala
Excerpt:
in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mrs. justice shircy v. wednesday, the 07th day of april 2021 / 17th chaithra, 1943 crime no.37/2021 of mannuthy police station , thrissur petitioner/accused nos.1 & 2 :- 1 rajesh aged 35 years s/o kochappan palakkal house, paravattani, kunnamthumkara, ollukkkara village, thrissur - 680655 2 linto @ thoman aged 31 years s/o babu kuruthukulangara house kachery desom, thrissur - 680005 by adv. sri.e.vijin karthik respondent/state :- state of kerala represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala pin - 682031 ajith murali- p.p this bail application having come up for admission on 07.04.2021, the court on the same day passed the following:orderdated this the 7th day of april 2021 application for regular bail. the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the matter is not pressed. it is recorded. accordingly, this application is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- shircy v. judge sma
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHIRCY V. WEDNESDAY, THE 07TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 17TH CHAITHRA, 1943 CRIME NO.37/2021 OF Mannuthy Police Station , Thrissur PETITIONER/ACCUSED NOS.1 & 2 :- 1 RAJESH AGED 35 YEARS S/O KOCHAPPAN PALAKKAL HOUSE, PARAVATTANI, KUNNAMTHUMKARA, OLLUKKKARA VILLAGE, THRISSUR - 680655 2 LINTO @ THOMAN AGED 31 YEARS S/O BABU KURUTHUKULANGARA HOUSE KACHERY DESOM, THRISSUR - 680005 BY ADV. SRI.E.VIJIN KARTHIK RESPONDENT/STATE :- STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA PIN - 682031 AJITH MURALI- P.P THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Dated this the 7th day of April 2021 Application for regular bail. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the matter is not pressed. It is recorded. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- SHIRCY V. JUDGE SMA