Sri. Jayram vs the Bangalore Development Authority - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1574480
CourtKarnataka Orders High Court
Decided OnJun-23-2026
Case NumberWP/575/2024
JudgeR. Nataraj
AppellantSri. Jayram
RespondentThe Bangalore Development Authority
Excerpt:
-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 23rd day of june, 2026 before the hon'ble mr. justice r. nataraj writ petition no. 575 of 2024 (bda) between: sri. jayram s/o ramegowda aged about 55 years r/at no. 330, 4th cross 7th main road, kumaraswamy layout 2nd stage bangalore bengaluru -560078. …petitioner (by sri. varun r r, advocate for sri. appannagowda k., advocate) and:1. the bangalore development authority sankey road, kumara park west bangalore-560 020 rep. by its commissioner digitally signed by 2. the deputy secretary-iii hemalathaj bangalore development authority location: sankey road, kumara park west b high court bangalore -560001.of karnataka …respondents (by sri. k. krishna, advocate) this writ petition is filed under article 226 of the constitution of india praying to quash cancellationorder passed by the r-2 dated: 04.08.2022 videno.bem.a.pra/ukaa-3/naprakemba/497/2022-23 as per annexure-a and direct the respondents to consider the representation dated: 10.01.2022 (annexure-l) and -2- representation dated: 02.09.2022 (annexure-n) made by the petitioner and etc. this petition, coming on for preliminary hearing in ‘b’ group, this day, order was made therein as under: coram: hon'ble mr. justice r. natarajoral ordera memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking permission of this court to withdraw this writ petition.2. memo is taken on record.3. in view of the memo, this petition is dismissed aswithdrawn. however, the liberty sought to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action is rejected. if the petitioner has an independent and separate cause of action, he is always at liberty to approach this court. sd/- (r. nataraj) judge ha list no.: 1 sl no.: 10
Judgment:

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 575 OF 2024 (BDA) BETWEEN: SRI. JAYRAM S/O RAMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT NO. 330, 4TH CROSS 7TH MAIN ROAD, KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT 2ND STAGE BANGALORE BENGALURU -560078. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VARUN R R, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. APPANNAGOWDA K., ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER Digitally signed by 2. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY-III HEMALATHA

J                  BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Location:          SANKEY ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST B
HIGH COURT         BANGALORE -560001.

OF KARNATAKA …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH CANCELLATION

ORDER PASSED BY THE R-2 DATED: 04.08.2022 VIDE

NO.BEM.A.PRA/UKAA-3/NAPRAKEMBA/497/2022-23 AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED: 10.01.2022 (ANNEXURE-L) AND -2- REPRESENTATION DATED: 02.09.2022 (ANNEXURE-N) MADE BY THE PETITIONER AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ

ORAL ORDER

A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition.

2. Memo is taken on record.

3. In view of the memo, this petition is dismissed as

withdrawn. However, the liberty sought to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action is rejected. If the petitioner has an independent and separate cause of action, he is always at liberty to approach this Court. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE HA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 10