Selvi vs the Tahsildar - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1496805
CourtChennai Orders High Court
Decided OnJan-30-2026
Case NumberWP/1942/2026
JudgeHonourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose
AppellantSELVI
RespondentThe Tahsildar
Excerpt:
in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 30.01.2026coram :the hon'ble mr. justice abdul quddhose selvi ... petitioner vs.chennai - 600 071. ... respondents prayer : writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india praying for issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the 1st respondent, the tahsildar, avadi, to consider the petitioner’s representation through counsel dated 11.10.2025, the findings of the survey already conducted for the property in survey no.166/3, sekkadu village, and the binding decree of permanent injunction in o.s.no.1016 of 2005, and page no.1 of 4consequently, to initiate appropriate proceedings and issue a patta in the name of the petitioner, mrs.selvi, within a time frame to be fixed by this court. for petitioner : m/s.sb and partners no appearance for respondents : mr.c.jayaprakash government advocate *****ordertoday, the matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal”. there is no representation on the side of the petitioner once again. on the last hearing date, i.e., on 28.01.2026, a representation was made by the learned government advocate appearing for the respondents that the prayer sought for in this writ petition has now become infructuous, since the petitioner has already been evicted from the premises for which survey and demarcation of boundaries is sought for. even on the last hearing date, on 28.01.2026, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner.2. in view of the same, the submission made by the learnedgovernment advocate appearing for the respondents has to be accepted page no.2 of 4 by this court. accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. no costs. index : yes / nospeaking order / non-speaking orderneutral citation case : yes/no sp to chennai - 600 071. page no.3 of 4abdul quddhose, j.sp page no.4 of 4
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 30.01.2026

CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Selvi ... Petitioner Vs.

Chennai - 600 071. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent, The Tahsildar, Avadi, to consider the Petitioner’s representation through counsel dated 11.10.2025, the findings of the survey already conducted for the property in Survey No.166/3, Sekkadu Village, and the binding decree of permanent injunction in O.S.No.1016 of 2005, and Page No.1 of 4

consequently, to initiate appropriate proceedings and issue a Patta in the name of the petitioner, Mrs.Selvi, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : M/s.SB and Partners No appearance For Respondents : Mr.C.Jayaprakash Government Advocate *****

ORDER

Today, the matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal”. There is no representation on the side of the petitioner once again. On the last hearing date, i.e., on 28.01.2026, a representation was made by the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents that the prayer sought for in this writ petition has now become infructuous, since the petitioner has already been evicted from the premises for which survey and demarcation of boundaries is sought for. Even on the last hearing date, on 28.01.2026, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner.

2. In view of the same, the submission made by the learned

Government Advocate appearing for the respondents has to be accepted Page No.2 of 4 by this Court. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Index : Yes / No

Speaking order / Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No sp To Chennai - 600 071. Page No.3 of 4

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

sp Page No.4 of 4