R Shanthi vs R Samykumar - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1489895
CourtChennai Orders High Court
Decided OnMar-30-2026
Case NumberCRL MP/1033/2025
JudgeHonourable Mr.Justice C.Kumarappan
AppellantR Shanthi
RespondentR Samykumar
Excerpt:
in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 30-03-2026coramthe hon'ble mr.justice c.kumarappan in r.shanthi ..petitioner(s) vs1. r.samykumar2. state rep. by inspector of police, crime no.186 of 2023 ..respondent(s)prayer: criminal miscellaneous petition is filed under section 483(3)/528 of bnss act to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to the 1 st respondent/accused in crl.o.p.no.20188 of 2023, dated 31.08.2023. for petitioner(s): no appearance for respondent(s): mr.e.kannadasan for r1 mr.r.kishore kumar, government advocate for r2.orderwhen the matter is posted for hearing on 26.03.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner and hence, the matter was listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. page1 of 32. today, inspite of the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner. hence, the criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no dpa to1. the inspector of police,2. the public prosecutor, high court, madras. page2 of 3c.kumarappan, j.dpa in page3 of 3
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30-03-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN in R.Shanthi ..Petitioner(s) Vs

1. R.Samykumar

2. State Rep. by Inspector of Police, Crime No.186 of 2023 ..Respondent(s)

Prayer: Criminal Miscellaneous petition is filed under Section 483(3)/528 of BNSS Act to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to the 1 st respondent/accused in Crl.O.P.No.20188 of 2023, dated 31.08.2023. For Petitioner(s): No appearance For Respondent(s): Mr.E.Kannadasan for R1 Mr.R.Kishore Kumar, Government Advocate for R2.

ORDER

When the matter is posted for hearing on 26.03.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner and hence, the matter was listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Page1 of 3

2. Today, inspite of the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the criminal Miscellaneous petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No dpa To

1. The Inspector of Police,

2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Page2 of 3

C.KUMARAPPAN, J.

dpa in Page3 of 3