Sinu vs State of Kerala - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1460129
CourtKerala Orders High Court
Decided OnApr-01-2022
Case NumberBail Appl./2100/2022
JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice Gopinath P.
AppellantSINU
RespondentState of Kerala
Excerpt:
in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice gopinath p. friday, the 1st day of april 2022 / 11th chaithra, 1944 crime no.897/2021 of alappuzha south police station petitioners/accused nos.18 & 19: 1 sinu, aged 31 years, s/o. kais, bhimas mansil, kaniyaparambu, vellakinar, alappuzha - 688 012. 2 saifudheen, aged 48 years, s/o sharafudheen, punnayckal purayidam veetil, valiyamaram ward, alappuzha - 688 012. by advs. nandagopal s.kurup suresh babu thomas respondent/complainant: state of kerala represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam - 682 031. by sri.p.narayanan, addl.public prosecutor this bail application having come up for admission on 01.04.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following:ordersince it is stated that the petitioners are entitled to statutory bail as on date, i am of the opinion that it is for the petitioners to approach the jurisdictional court for bail. accordingly, this bail application is closed. sd/- gopinath p. judge dk
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL 2022 / 11TH CHAITHRA, 1944 CRIME NO.897/2021 OF ALAPPUZHA SOUTH POLICE STATION PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.18 & 19: 1 SINU, AGED 31 YEARS, S/O. KAIS, BHIMAS MANSIL, KANIYAPARAMBU, VELLAKINAR, ALAPPUZHA - 688 012. 2 SAIFUDHEEN, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O SHARAFUDHEEN, PUNNAYCKAL PURAYIDAM VEETIL, VALIYAMARAM WARD, ALAPPUZHA - 688 012. BY ADVS. NANDAGOPAL S.KURUP SURESH BABU THOMAS RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031. BY SRI.P.NARAYANAN, ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.04.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Since it is stated that the petitioners are entitled to statutory bail as on date, I am of the opinion that it is for the petitioners to approach the Jurisdictional Court for bail. Accordingly, this bail application is closed. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE DK