| SooperKanoon Citation | sooperkanoon.com/14598 |
| Court | Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi |
| Decided On | Nov-03-1998 |
| Reported in | (1999)(105)ELT447TriDel |
| Appellant | Collector of Central Excise |
| Respondent | Snap Services |
2. The Collector (Appeals) order gives the impression that the same disposed of two appeals filed by the assessee. However, since the appeal order bears one number and Order-in-Original is also single, although taking care of two SCNs, we treat this appeal as one appeal.
3. At the material time Heading 84.14 covered fans and hoods, parts of these items were also covered in the same heading. Air conditioning machines, refrigerators and other machinery involving the elements of air conditioning and refrigeration as well as goods, vending machines, incorporating refrigerating devices were at the material time classified under respective Headings namely 84.15, 84.18, 84.19, 84.76.
Parts of such machinery would fall under those headings either by virtue of the structure of the entry or by way of chapter notes. The exclusion clause in Notification No. 175/86 read as : "Refrigerating and air conditioning appliances and machinery and parts of accessories thereof falling under Chapter 84, 85 or 90".
Since Heading 84.14 did not relate to air-conditioning or refrigerating machinery, goods and parts falling thereunder were clearly eligible for the benefit of this notification.
4. We therefore, find no substance in the Appeal filed by Revenue, Upholding the impugned order, we dismiss this Appeal.