The Manager Vs Valli - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1433429
CourtChennai Orders High Court
Decided OnJun-24-2026
Case NumberCMP/10431/2026
JudgeHonourable Mr Justice C.V. Karthikeyan,Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar
AppellantThe Manager
RespondentValli
Excerpt:
cmp no.10431 of 2026 in cma sr no.200928 of 2025c.v.karthikeyan, j.andk.rajasekar, j.(order of the court was made by c.v.karthikeyan, j.) this petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 21 days in filing the appeal against the order dated 16.07.2025 passed in mcop no.951 of 2018 on the file of the mact additional district judge, ftc, kancheepuram. 2.notice had been directed to the respondents, notice had been served and proof affidavit had also been filed. but there is no appearance for the respondents. 3.it had been stated that owing to administrative reasons, there has been a delay of 21 days. 4.in view of the reasons stated, the delay stands condoned. registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order. (c.v.k.j., ) (k.r.s.j., ) sli 24.06.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Judgment:

CMP No.10431 of 2026 in CMA SR No.200928 of 2025

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.

and

K.RAJASEKAR, J.

(Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan, J.) This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 21 days in filing the appeal against the order dated 16.07.2025 passed in MCOP No.951 of 2018 on the file of the MACT Additional District Judge, FTC, Kancheepuram. 2.Notice had been directed to the respondents, notice had been served and proof affidavit had also been filed. But there is no appearance for the respondents. 3.It had been stated that owing to administrative reasons, there has been a delay of 21 days. 4.In view of the reasons stated, the delay stands condoned. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order. (C.V.K.J., ) (K.R.S.J., ) sli 24.06.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis