C.SELVI Vs Rajkumar - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1425257
CourtChennai Orders High Court
Decided OnApr-28-2026
Case NumberCMP/14664/2025
JudgeHonourable Mr Justice C.V. Karthikeyan,Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar
AppellantC.Selvi
RespondentRajkumar
Excerpt:
inc.m.a sr. no.25554 of 2025 and this petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 136 days in filing the appeal. 2.in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, it had been stated that after obtaining the certified copy of the decree, steps were taken to file the appeal, but there was a delay in generating the court fee. 3.notice had been directed to the respondents. the learned counsel had entered appearance on behalf of the 3rd respondent. the 1st and 2nd respondents had remained ex parte even before the trial court. 4.at any rate, to provide opportunity to the appellants herein, to advance arguments on all arguable points, the delay is condoned. accordingly, this petition is allowed. the registry is directed to number the appeal if it is otherwise inorder.(c.v.k., j.) (k.r.s., j.) smv and smv in cma sr. no.25554 of 2025
Judgment:

in

C.M.A SR. No.25554 of 2025 AND This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 136 days in filing the appeal. 2.In the affidavit filed in support of the petition, it had been stated that after obtaining the certified copy of the decree, steps were taken to file the appeal, but there was a delay in generating the Court fee. 3.Notice had been directed to the respondents. The learned counsel had entered appearance on behalf of the 3rd respondent. The 1st and 2nd respondents had remained ex parte even before the trial Court. 4.At any rate, to provide opportunity to the appellants herein, to advance arguments on all arguable points, the delay is condoned. Accordingly, this petition is allowed. The Registry is directed to number the appeal if it is otherwise in

order.

(C.V.K., J.) (K.R.S., J.) smv AND smv in CMA SR. No.25554 of 2025