Chitturan vs Chamimala - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1385911
CourtKerala Orders High Court
Decided OnJul-05-2023
Case NumberSA/141/2001
JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice a.Muhamed Mustaque
AppellantChitturan
RespondentChamimala
Excerpt:
in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a.muhamed mustaque wednesday, the 5th day of july 2023 / 14th ashadha, 1945 against the order/judgment in as 205/1991 of district court & sessions court, palakkad os 298/1983 of munsiff court, chittur appellants: 1 chitturan s/o.raman. 2 kocha, w/o.chitturan, both are residing at malayampallam, vadavannur amsom, chittur taluk, palakkad district. by adv sri.krishna prasad. s respondents: chamimala s/o.thayappan, residing at karuthedath kolambu, vadavannur amsom, chittur taluk, palakkad district. by advs. sri.p.r.venkatesh sri.g.keerthivas this second appeal having been finally heard on 05.07.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: ..2..j u d g m e n tit is submitted that both the appellants had passed away and no legal heirs have come forward to get themselves impleaded. accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution. sd/- a.muhamed mustaque judge pr
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JULY 2023 / 14TH ASHADHA, 1945 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN AS 205/1991 OF DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT, PALAKKAD OS 298/1983 OF MUNSIFF COURT, CHITTUR APPELLANTS: 1 CHITTURAN S/O.RAMAN. 2 KOCHA, W/O.CHITTURAN, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT MALAYAMPALLAM, VADAVANNUR AMSOM, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV SRI.KRISHNA PRASAD. S RESPONDENTS: CHAMIMALA S/O.THAYAPPAN, RESIDING AT KARUTHEDATH KOLAMBU, VADAVANNUR AMSOM, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.P.R.VENKATESH SRI.G.KEERTHIVAS THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05.07.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ..2..

J U D G M E N T

It is submitted that both the appellants had passed away and no legal heirs have come forward to get themselves impleaded. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE PR