Mujeeb Rahman vs Sajida - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1366986
CourtKerala Orders High Court
Decided OnOct-31-2023
Case NumberRPFC/28/2016
JudgeHonourable Mr.Justice C.S.Dias
AppellantMujeeb Rahman
RespondentSajida
Excerpt:
in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c.s.dias tuesday, the 31st day of october 2023 / 9th karthika, 1945 against the order in mc 80/2013 of family court, tirur revision petitioner/respondent: mujeeb rahman aged 30 years s/o.muhammed @ kunhimon, mankadavath palliyalil house, pallar, choondikkal, thirunavaya.p.o., tirur taluk sri.p.vijaya bhanu (sr.) smt.mitha sudhindran sri.v.c.sarath respondents/petitioners: 1 sajida, aged 26 years 2 minor dilshad akthar aged 4 years s/o.mujeeb rahman, represented by his mother 1st respondent, sajida, aged 26 years, sri.jithin lukose sri.p.samsudin this rev.petition(family court) having come up for admission on 31.10.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following:orderthe revision petition is filed challenging the orderpassed in m.c no.80/2013 of the family court, thrissur. the revision petitioner was the respondent and the respondents were the petitioners before the family court.2. today when the revision petition was takenup for consideration, the learned counsel appearing on both sides submitted that the subject matter in dispute between the parties has been settled out of court. on the basis of the said submission, the connected mat.appeal no.112/2016 was dismissed by this court on 25.10.2019. therefore, the revision petitioner is no longer desirous of prosecuting the revision petition. the said submission is recorded.3. in the light of the above submission, i am of the view that the revision petition has become infructuous. resultantly, the revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/-c.s.dias,judge ma/31.10.2023
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 9TH KARTHIKA, 1945 AGAINST THE ORDER IN MC 80/2013 OF FAMILY COURT, TIRUR REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT: MUJEEB RAHMAN AGED 30 YEARS S/O.MUHAMMED @ KUNHIMON, MANKADAVATH PALLIYALIL HOUSE, PALLAR, CHOONDIKKAL, THIRUNAVAYA.P.O., TIRUR TALUK SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU (SR.) SMT.MITHA SUDHINDRAN SRI.V.C.SARATH RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS: 1 SAJIDA, AGED 26 YEARS 2 MINOR DILSHAD AKTHAR AGED 4 YEARS S/O.MUJEEB RAHMAN, REPRESENTED BY HIS MOTHER 1ST RESPONDENT, SAJIDA, AGED 26 YEARS, SRI.JITHIN LUKOSE SRI.P.SAMSUDIN THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.10.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

The revision petition is filed challenging the order

passed in M.C No.80/2013 of the Family Court, Thrissur. The revision petitioner was the respondent and the respondents were the petitioners before the Family Court.

2. Today when the revision petition was taken

up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing on both sides submitted that the subject matter in dispute between the parties has been settled out of court. On the basis of the said submission, the connected Mat.Appeal No.112/2016 was dismissed by this Court on 25.10.2019. Therefore, the revision petitioner is no longer desirous of prosecuting the revision petition. The said submission is recorded.

3. In the light of the above submission, I am of the view that the revision petition has become infructuous. Resultantly, the revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/-C.S.DIAS,JUDGE ma/31.10.2023