Rajesh vs Mary - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1351611
CourtKerala High Court
Decided OnJan-31-2023
Case NumberFAO/76/2017
JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice a.Muhamed Mustaque,Honourable Mrs. Justice Shoba Annamma Eapen
AppellantRajesh
RespondentMARY
Excerpt:
in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a.muhamed mustaque & the honourable mrs. justice shoba annamma eapen tuesday, the 31st day of january 2023 / 11th magha, 1944 fao no. 76 of 2017 against the common order in i.a.nos.187 & 185 of 2015 in os 512/2010 dated 8.3.2017 of additional sub court, irinjalakuda appellant/petitioner/1st defendant rajesh,aged 53 , s/o. themath veetil narayanan, vellikulangara village, kodungallur desom, mukundapuram taluk by adv sri.g.sreekumar (chelur) respondents/respondents and the legal heirs of the first respondent/second plaintiff, defendants 2 to 5 and the legal heirs of the first plaintiff1 mary,aged 65, w/o. kannampuzha ouseph, kundai estate desom, varandharapilly village, p.o palapilly, mukundapuram taluk -680001 2 ramesh aged 33,s/o. chattuparambil mohanan, kanakamala desom,varandharapilly village,p.o palapilly,mukundapuram taluk - 680001 3 dasan @ babuttan @ babu aged 35,kunnumakaraveetil dinakaran,vattekatt chattelam padam desom,kodakara village,mukundapuram taluk - 680001 4 aneesh, aged 28,s/o. pallikudan kuttan, pazhambilly desom,kodakara village, mukundapuram taluk - 5 davis aged 51,s/o. njarekadan anthony,koplipadamdesom,vellikulangara village, mukundapuram taluk - 6 varghese aged 45,s/o. kannampuzha ouseph,kundai estate mukundapuram taluk - 680001 7 shiny aged 39,d/o. kannampuzha ouseph,kundai estate mukundapuram taluk -680001 this first appeal from orders having come up for admission on 31.01.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: a.muhamed mustaque & shoba annamma eapen, jj. ------------------------------------------------- f.a.o.76 of 2017 ------------------------- dated : 31st january, 2023judgmentmuhamed mustaque, j.several opportunities were given to the appellant to take steps; but no steps have been taken so far. the appeal is hence, dismissed for non-prosecution. a.muhamed mustaque, judge shoba annamma eapen, judge mrcs
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 11TH MAGHA, 1944 FAO NO. 76 OF 2017 AGAINST THE COMMON ORDER IN I.A.NOS.187 & 185 OF 2015 IN OS 512/2010 DATED 8.3.2017 OF ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, IRINJALAKUDA APPELLANT/PETITIONER/1ST DEFENDANT RAJESH,AGED 53 , S/O. THEMATH VEETIL NARAYANAN, VELLIKULANGARA VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR DESOM, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK BY ADV SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS AND THE LEGAL HEIRS OF THE FIRST RESPONDENT/SECOND PLAINTIFF, DEFENDANTS 2 TO 5 AND THE LEGAL HEIRS OF THE FIRST PLAINTIFF

1 MARY,AGED 65, W/O. KANNAMPUZHA OUSEPH, KUNDAI ESTATE DESOM, VARANDHARAPILLY VILLAGE, P.O PALAPILLY, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK -680001 2 RAMESH AGED 33,S/O. CHATTUPARAMBIL MOHANAN, KANAKAMALA DESOM,VARANDHARAPILLY VILLAGE,P.O PALAPILLY,MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK - 680001 3 DASAN @ BABUTTAN @ BABU AGED 35,KUNNUMAKARAVEETIL DINAKARAN,VATTEKATT CHATTELAM PADAM DESOM,KODAKARA VILLAGE,MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK - 680001 4 ANEESH, AGED 28,S/O. PALLIKUDAN KUTTAN, PAZHAMBILLY DESOM,KODAKARA VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK - 5 DAVIS AGED 51,S/O. NJAREKADAN ANTHONY,KOPLIPADAM

DESOM,VELLIKULANGARA VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK - 6 VARGHESE AGED 45,S/O. KANNAMPUZHA OUSEPH,KUNDAI ESTATE MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK - 680001 7 SHINY AGED 39,D/O. KANNAMPUZHA OUSEPH,KUNDAI ESTATE MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK -680001 THIS FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDERS HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.01.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, JJ. ------------------------------------------------- F.A.O.76 OF 2017 ------------------------- Dated : 31st January, 2023

JUDGMENT

Muhamed Mustaque, J.

Several opportunities were given to the appellant to take steps; but no steps have been taken so far. The appeal is hence, dismissed for non-prosecution. A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, Judge SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, Judge Mrcs