Anuja Vijayan vs the Manager - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1311207
CourtKerala Orders High Court
Decided OnMar-13-2024
Case NumberWP(C)/7056/2024
JudgeHonourable Mr.Justice N.Nagaresh
AppellantAnuja Vijayan
RespondentThe Manager
Excerpt:
in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice n.nagaresh wednesday, the 13th day of march 2024 / 23rd phalguna, 1945 wp(c) no. 7056 of 2024 petitioner: anuja vijayan aged 50 years w/o. vijayan, residing at karthika, edavanassery, mynagapally, kollam, pin - 690519 by advs. s.sreekumar (kollam) namitha rajesh respondents: 1 the manager north mynagapally branch, kollam, pin - 690519 2 the authorized officer/ area manager regional office, thiruvananthapuram, pin - 695023 by adv. sri.p.c. sasidharan this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 13.03.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following: wp(c) no.7056 of 2024judgmentdated this the 13th day of march, 2024 counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, the dispute between the parties has been settled out of court. in view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- n.nagaresh judge spk
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 23RD PHALGUNA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 7056 OF 2024 PETITIONER: ANUJA VIJAYAN AGED 50 YEARS W/O. VIJAYAN, RESIDING AT KARTHIKA, EDAVANASSERY, MYNAGAPALLY, KOLLAM, PIN - 690519 BY ADVS. S.SREEKUMAR (KOLLAM) NAMITHA RAJESH RESPONDENTS: 1 THE MANAGER NORTH MYNAGAPALLY BRANCH, KOLLAM, PIN - 690519 2 THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER/ AREA MANAGER REGIONAL OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695023 BY ADV. SRI.P.C. SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) No.7056 of 2024

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 13th day of March, 2024 Counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, the dispute between the parties has been settled out of Court. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- N.NAGARESH JUDGE spk