Abdulkalam vs Farook - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1302739
CourtKerala Orders High Court
Decided OnMar-15-2024
Case NumberCRP/299/2022
JudgeHonourable Mr.Justice C. Jayachandran
AppellantAbdulkalam
RespondentFarook
Excerpt:
in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c. jayachandran friday, the 15th day of march 2024 / 25th phalguna, 1945 crp no. 299 of 2022 against the order in ep 104/19 & ea 17/2021 in os no.528 of 2010 of munsiff court, chittur revision petitioner/respondent in ea & ep: abdulkalam aged 54 years, s/o. late muhammed haneefa, kambrathchalla, muthalamada amsom & post, sajan vargheese k. liju. m.p jophy pothen kandankary respondent/petitioner in ea & ep: farook aged 50 years, s/o. muhammed moitheen, chulliyarmedu, muthalamada amsom, desom & post, binoy vasudevan r.manikantan this civil revision petition having come up for admission on 15.03.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following: c.r.p.no.299 of 2022judgmentdated this the 15th day of march 2024 learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this civil revision petition is not pressed and a memo is filed to that effect. in the circumstance, this civil revision petition stands dismissed as not pressed. sd/- c. jayachandran judge vpv
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 25TH PHALGUNA, 1945 CRP NO. 299 OF 2022 AGAINST THE ORDER IN EP 104/19 & EA 17/2021 IN OS NO.528 OF 2010 OF MUNSIFF COURT, CHITTUR REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT IN EA & EP: ABDULKALAM AGED 54 YEARS, S/O. LATE MUHAMMED HANEEFA, KAMBRATHCHALLA, MUTHALAMADA AMSOM & POST, SAJAN VARGHEESE K. LIJU. M.P JOPHY POTHEN KANDANKARY RESPONDENT/PETITIONER IN EA & EP: FAROOK AGED 50 YEARS, S/O. MUHAMMED MOITHEEN, CHULLIYARMEDU, MUTHALAMADA AMSOM, DESOM & POST, BINOY VASUDEVAN R.MANIKANTAN THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.R.P.No.299 of 2022

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 15th day of March 2024 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this civil revision petition is not pressed and a memo is filed to that effect. In the circumstance, this civil revision petition stands dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- C. Jayachandran Judge vpv