Rishipreet Sachdeva vs Ravneet Kaur Sachdeva - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1275566
SubjectRight to Information
CourtDelhi Orders High Court
Decided OnApr-30-2026
Case NumberCRL.M.C./3061/2026
JudgeHon'Ble Mr. Justice Prateek Jalan
AppellantRishipreet Sachdeva
RespondentRavneet Kaur Sachdeva
Appellant AdvocateMr. Prashant Mendiratta, Mr. Anirudh K. Mudgal, Mr. Shubhashish Sharma, Ms. Vaishnavi Saxena, Ms. Avni Soni, Ms. Sakshi Jain
Respondent AdvocateMr. Manoj Chouhan, Mr. Ujjwal Singh Parmar, Ms. Neha Raj Singh
Excerpt:
* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ crl.m.c. 3061/2026, crl.m.a. 12470/2026, crl.m.a. rishipreet sachdeva .....petitioner through: mr. prashant mendiratta, mr. anirudh k. mudgal, mr. shubhashish sharma, ms. vaishnavi saxena, ms. avni soni & ms. sakshi jain, advocates.versusravneet kaur sachdeva .....respondent through: mr. manoj chouhan, mr. ujjwal singh parmar & ms. neha raj singh, advocates.coram:hon’ble mr. justice prateek jalanorder% 30.04.20261. the present petition, under section 528 of the bharaitya nagarik suraksha sanhita, 2023, arises out of complaint case [ct casewomen from domestic violence act, 2005 [“dv act”]. by an orderdated 09.04.2025, the mahila court closed the petitioner’s right to file a written statement in the proceedings. the petitioner assailed the saidorder before the appellate court, which upheld the said order vide orderdated 13.10.2025.2. in the course of hearing, learned counsel on both sides have come crl.m.c. 3061/2026 page 1 of 2to an agreement that the petition may be disposed of, in the following terms:- a. the petitioner had served a copy of a written statement under the dv act proceedings upon the respondent prior to 09.04.2025. the same be taken on record, subject to payment of costs of rs. 30,000/- by the petitioner to the respondent. b. the respondent’s application for interim maintenance is listed before the mahila court on 02.05.2026. the written statement may be taken on record on that date, subject to payment of costs as aforesaid. c. the petitioner will not seek any adjournment on the aforesaid date before the mahila court. d. the mahila court is requested to consider the application for interim maintenance as expeditiously as possible, having regard to the position of the board and the age of the matters pending before it.3. the petition, alongwith pending applications, stands disposed of with these directions. prateek jalan, j april 30, 2026 ‘pv’/ad/ crl.m.c. 3061/2026 page 2 of 2
Judgment:

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 3061/2026, CRL.M.A. 12470/2026, CRL.M.A. RISHIPREET SACHDEVA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Prashant Mendiratta, Mr. Anirudh K. Mudgal, Mr. Shubhashish Sharma, Ms. Vaishnavi Saxena, Ms. Avni Soni & Ms. Sakshi Jain, Advocates.

versus

RAVNEET KAUR SACHDEVA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Chouhan, Mr. Ujjwal Singh Parmar & Ms. Neha Raj Singh, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

ORDER

% 30.04.2026

1. The present petition, under Section 528 of the Bharaitya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, arises out of complaint case [CT Case

Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 [“DV Act”]. By an order

dated 09.04.2025, the Mahila Court closed the petitioner’s right to file a written statement in the proceedings. The petitioner assailed the said

order before the Appellate Court, which upheld the said order vide order

dated 13.10.2025.

2. In the course of hearing, learned counsel on both sides have come CRL.M.C. 3061/2026 Page 1 of 2

to an agreement that the petition may be disposed of, in the following terms:- a. The petitioner had served a copy of a written statement under the DV Act proceedings upon the respondent prior to 09.04.2025. The same be taken on record, subject to payment of costs of Rs. 30,000/- by the petitioner to the respondent. b. The respondent’s application for interim maintenance is listed before the Mahila Court on 02.05.2026. The written statement may be taken on record on that date, subject to payment of costs as aforesaid. c. The petitioner will not seek any adjournment on the aforesaid date before the Mahila Court. d. The Mahila Court is requested to consider the application for interim maintenance as expeditiously as possible, having regard to the position of the Board and the age of the matters pending before it.

3. The petition, alongwith pending applications, stands disposed of with these directions. PRATEEK JALAN, J APRIL 30, 2026 ‘pv’/AD/ CRL.M.C. 3061/2026 Page 2 of 2