Inderjeet Singh & Ors vs.the Govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1225737
CourtDelhi High Court
Decided OnSep-30-2019
AppellantInderjeet Singh & Ors
RespondentThe Govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Excerpt:
$~2 * in the high court of delhi at new delhi date of decision:30. 09.2019 + crl.m.c. 4537/2019 inderjeet singh & ors ........ petitioners through: mr.mohit mathur, sr. adv. with mr.gaurav dua, adv. versus the govt. of nct of delhi & anr through: mr.hirein sharma, app for state. ........ respondents mr.kirti uppal, sr. adv. with mr.pramod kumar, adv. with mr.anurag kasana, mr.arbind yadav & mr.ravish verma, advs. for r-2. si r.s. pandit ps kalyan puri. coram: hon'ble mr. justice suresh kumar kait judgment (oral) crl. m.a. 35476/2019 1.2. allowed, subject to all just exceptions. application is disposed of. crl.m.c.4537/2019 3. vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby quashing fir no.703/2013 dated 29.11.2013, registered at ps – crl.m.c.4537/2019 page 1 of 3 kalyanpuri, for the offences punishable under sections 307/3ipc and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.4. 5. notice issued. notice is accepted by learned app for the state and counsel for the respondent no.2.6. with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.7. the present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent no.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.8. the petitioners and respondent no.2 have entered into an amicable settlement vide settlement/compromise deed dated 30.08.2019.9. respondent no.2 is personally present in court with learned counsel and they have been identified by si r.s. pandit/io and submit that matter has been settled and he does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.10. taking into account the aforesaid facts, this court is inclined to quash the concerned fir as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further. crl.m.c.4537/2019 page 2 of 3 11. for the reasons afore-recorded, the fir no.703/2013 dated 29.11.2013, registered at ps – kalyanpuri, for the offences punishable under sections 307/3ipc and consequent proceedings therefrom are quashed.12. the petition is allowed accordingly.13. order dasti, under the signature of court master. (suresh kumar kait) judge september30 2019/ab crl.m.c.4537/2019 page 3 of 3
Judgment:

$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:

30. 09.2019 + CRL.M.C. 4537/2019 INDERJEET SINGH & ORS ........ Petitioner

s Through: Mr.Mohit Mathur, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Gaurav Dua, Adv. versus THE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Through: Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for State. ........ RESPONDENTS

Mr.Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Pramod Kumar, Adv. with Mr.Anurag Kasana, Mr.Arbind Yadav & Mr.Ravish Verma, Advs. for R-2. SI R.S. Pandit PS Kalyan Puri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT

(ORAL) CRL. M.A. 35476/2019 1.

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C.4537/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby quashing FIR No.703/2013 dated 29.11.2013, registered at PS – CRL.M.C.4537/2019 Page 1 of 3 Kalyanpuri, for the offences punishable under Sections 307/3
IPC and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.

4. 5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2.

6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

7. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent No.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.

8. The petitioners and respondent no.2 have entered into an amicable settlement vide settlement/compromise deed dated 30.08.2019.

9. Respondent No.2 is personally present in Court with learned counsel and they have been identified by SI R.S. Pandit/IO and submit that matter has been settled and he does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

10. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further. CRL.M.C.4537/2019 Page 2 of 3 11. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No.703/2013 dated 29.11.2013, registered at PS – Kalyanpuri, for the offences punishable under Sections 307/3
IPC and consequent proceedings therefrom are quashed.

12. The petition is allowed accordingly.

13. Order dasti, under the signature of Court Master. (SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE SEPTEMBER30 2019/ab CRL.M.C.4537/2019 Page 3 of 3