M/S Samsung India Electronics Pvt Ltd vs.jagbir Singh - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1219727
CourtDelhi High Court
Decided OnDec-04-2018
AppellantM/S Samsung India Electronics Pvt Ltd
RespondentJagbir Singh
Excerpt:
$~13 * in the high court of delhi at new delhi + c.r.p. 181/2015 m/s samsung india electronics pvt ltd through: mr. niraj singh, advocate. ........ petitioner versus jagbir singh ..... respondent through: ms. vaishaly singh, advocate for ms.reena singh, advocate along with respondent in person. coram: hon'ble mr. justice vinod goel % order0412.2018 1. learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent, who appears in person, and his counsel, ms. vaishaly singh, appearing for ms. reena singh, advocate submit that the parties have amicably resolved and settled all their disputes outside the court orally. pursuant to the settlement, the learned counsel for the petitioner has handed over a demand draft dated 23.10.2018 of rs.1 lakh issued by the bank of america, 1st floor, dlf centre sansad marg, new delhi 110001 in favour of j.s. electronics, the proprietor of which is the c.r.p.181/2015 page 1 of 2 respondent/plaintiff. the said demand draft of rs.1 lakh, has been accepted by the respondent through his counsel in full and final settlement of all his claims.2. both the learned counsel for the parties submit that in view of the settlement, this revision petition and civil suit no.cs- 50597/2016 (previous no.388/2014) are to be withdrawn by the petitioner and the respondent from this court and the court of learned civil judge, south-east district, saket new delhi respectively.3. the respondent submits and undertakes to withdraw the civil suit on the next date of hearing.4. the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not press this revision petition.5. as such, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. both the parties shall remain bound by the terms and conditions of the settlement.6. trial court record be sent back immediately. vinod goel, j.december04 2018 ‘sandeep’ c.r.p.181/2015 page 2 of 2
Judgment:

$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.R.P. 181/2015 M/S SAMSUNG INDIA ELECTRONICS PVT LTD Through: Mr. Niraj Singh, Advocate. ........ Petitioner

versus JAGBIR SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Vaishaly Singh, Advocate for Ms.Reena Singh, Advocate along with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL % ORDER

0412.2018 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent, who appears in person, and his counsel, Ms. Vaishaly Singh, appearing for Ms. Reena Singh, Advocate submit that the parties have amicably resolved and settled all their disputes outside the Court orally. Pursuant to the settlement, the learned counsel for the petitioner has handed over a Demand Draft dated 23.10.2018 of Rs.1 lakh issued by The Bank of America, 1st Floor, DLF Centre Sansad Marg, New Delhi 110001 in favour of J.S. Electronics, the proprietor of which is the C.R.P.181/2015 Page 1 of 2 respondent/plaintiff. The said Demand Draft of Rs.1 lakh, has been accepted by the respondent through his counsel in full and final settlement of all his claims.

2. Both the learned counsel for the parties submit that in view of the settlement, this revision petition and civil suit No.CS- 50597/2016 (previous No.388/2014) are to be withdrawn by the petitioner and the respondent from this Court and the Court of learned Civil Judge, South-East District, Saket New Delhi respectively.

3. The respondent submits and undertakes to withdraw the civil suit on the next date of hearing.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not press this revision petition.

5. As such, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Both the parties shall remain bound by the terms and conditions of the settlement.

6. Trial Court record be sent back immediately. VINOD GOEL, J.

DECEMBER04 2018 ‘sandeep’ C.R.P.181/2015 Page 2 of 2