Prem Thakran vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1215377
CourtDelhi High Court
Decided OnMay-28-2018
AppellantPrem Thakran
RespondentGovt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Excerpt:
* + in the high court of delhi at new delhi date of order: may 28, 2018 w.p.(c) 134/2017 prem thakran ........ petitioner through: mr. yudhvir singh chauhan and versus ms. jatinder kaur, advocates govt. of nct of delhi and ors. .....respondents through: ms. prabhsahay kaur, advocate for r-1 and 2. mr. anurag lakhotia, advocate coram: hon'ble mr. justice sunil gaur order (oral) 1.... petitioner had sought re-employment/extension of her service for a period of two years and extension to petitioner has been declined and in the counter affidavit filed by respondent no.2, it is disclosed that petitioner does not have any national or state level award. upon hearing, this court finds that denial of extension of service to petitioner is justified. however, case of petitioner for re-employment has not been effectively considered and in view of order of 27th september, 2013, petitioner’s case for re-employment ought to be effectively considered.2. in light of the aforesaid, this petition is disposed of with permission to petitioner to make a concise representation to the respondent-school to seek re-employment, in light of the directorate’s order of 27th september, 2013 within a period of two weeks. if any such w.p.(c) 134/2017 page 1 of 2 representation is received by respondent-school, it be effectively considered with effect from 1st january, 2017 in light of the applicable rules and regulations and a speaking response to the said representation be given within a period of eight weeks and the fate of the representation be made known to petitioner within a week thereafter, so that petitioner may avail of the remedies as available in law, if need be.3. with aforesaid directions, this petition stands disposed of. copy of this order be given dasti to petitioner’s counsel. (sunil gaur) judge may28 2018 p w.p.(c) 134/2017 page 2 of 2
Judgment:

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 28, 2018 W.P.(C) 134/2017 PREM THAKRAN ........ Petitioner

Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan and versus Ms. Jatinder Kaur, Advocates GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Advocate for R-1 and 2. Mr. Anurag Lakhotia, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER

(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner

had sought re-employment/extension of her service for a period of two years and extension to petitioner has been declined and in the counter affidavit filed by respondent No.2, it is disclosed that petitioner does not have any National or State level Award. Upon hearing, this Court finds that denial of extension of service to petitioner is justified. However, case of petitioner for re-employment has not been effectively considered and in view of Order of 27th September, 2013, petitioner’s case for re-employment ought to be effectively considered.

2. In light of the aforesaid, this petition is disposed of with permission to petitioner to make a concise Representation to the respondent-School to seek re-employment, in light of the Directorate’s order of 27th September, 2013 within a period of two weeks. If any such W.P.(C) 134/2017 Page 1 of 2 Representation is received by respondent-School, it be effectively considered with effect from 1st January, 2017 in light of the applicable Rules and Regulations and a speaking response to the said Representation be given within a period of eight weeks and the fate of the Representation be made known to petitioner within a week thereafter, so that petitioner may avail of the remedies as available in law, if need be.

3. With aforesaid directions, this petition stands disposed of. Copy of this order be given dasti to petitioner’s counsel. (SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE MAY28 2018 p W.P.(C) 134/2017 Page 2 of 2