Mrs. Sneh Saini vs.managing Committee of Maharaja Agarsain Public and Anr. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1211607
CourtDelhi High Court
Decided OnDec-22-2017
AppellantMrs. Sneh Saini
RespondentManaging Committee of Maharaja Agarsain Public and Anr.
Excerpt:
$~19, 24, 31 & 33 * in the high court of delhi at new delhi date of order: december 22, 2017 + w.p.(c) 11592/2017 w.p.(c) 11641/2017 w.p.(c) 11668/2017 w.p.(c) 11680/2017 mrs. renu jain mrs. pratibha goyal mrs. sneh saini mrs. manju bala ........ petitioners through: mr.kamlesh kumar, advocate versus managing committee of maharaja agarsain public and anr. ........ respondents through: mr.anuj aggarwal, asc with mr.ayush singh rajora, ms.niti jain and ms.deboshree mukherjee, advocates for r-2 in w.p.(c) nos.11592/2017, 11641/2017 & 11680/2017 mr.devesh singh, asc (gnctd) with ms.neelam kholiya, advocate for r-2 in w.p.(c) no.11668/2017 coram: hon'ble mr. justice sunil gaur1 order oral in these petitions, a mandamus is sought to first respondent to pay the arrears of salary to petitioners in terms of orders of 11th february, 2009 and 1st july, 2016. at the outset, learned counsel for petitioners submits that to seek the relief as sought herein, representation has not w.p.(c) no.11592/2017 & conn.matters page 1 been made. in the peculiar facts, permission to petitioners to make representations to respondent no.1 within two weeks ought to be granted.2. despite service of advance notice, none has appeared on behalf of first respondent.3. upon hearing, these petitions are disposed of with permission to petitioners to make representations within two weeks and if such representations are received by the first respondent, then it be accordingly dealt with as per the applicable rules and regulations within six weeks and its fate be conveyed to petitioners within two weeks thereafter, so that petitioners may avail of the remedy, as available in law, if need be. dasti. sunil gaur (judge) december22 2017 mamta w.p.(c) no.11592/2017 & conn.matters page 2
Judgment:

$~19, 24, 31 & 33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 22, 2017 + W.P.(C) 11592/2017 W.P.(C) 11641/2017 W.P.(C) 11668/2017 W.P.(C) 11680/2017 MRS. RENU JAIN MRS. PRATIBHA GOYAL MRS. SNEH SAINI MRS. MANJU BALA ........ Petitioner

s Through: Mr.Kamlesh Kumar, Advocate versus MANAGING COMMITTEE OF MAHARAJA AGARSAIN PUBLIC AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS

Through: Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Mr.Ayush Singh Rajora, Ms.Niti Jain and Ms.Deboshree Mukherjee, Advocates for R-2 in W.P.(C) Nos.11592/2017, 11641/2017 & 11680/2017 Mr.Devesh Singh, ASC (GNCTD) with Ms.Neelam Kholiya, Advocate for R-2 in W.P.(C) No.11668/2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR1 ORDER ORAL In these petitions, a mandamus is sought to first respondent to pay the arrears of salary to petitioners in terms of orders of 11th February, 2009 and 1st July, 2016. At the outset, learned counsel for petitioners submits that to seek the relief as sought herein, representation has not W.P.(C) No.11592/2017 & conn.matters Page 1 been made. In the peculiar facts, permission to petitioners to make representations to respondent No.1 within two weeks ought to be granted.

2. Despite service of advance notice, none has appeared on behalf of first respondent.

3. Upon hearing, these petitions are disposed of with permission to petitioners to make representations within two weeks and if such representations are received by the first respondent, then it be accordingly dealt with as per the applicable rules and regulations within six weeks and its fate be conveyed to petitioners within two weeks thereafter, so that petitioners may avail of the remedy, as available in law, if need be. Dasti. SUNIL GAUR (JUDGE) DECEMBER22 2017 mamta W.P.(C) No.11592/2017 & conn.matters Page 2