SooperKanoon Citation | sooperkanoon.com/12102 |
Court | Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi |
Decided On | Nov-11-1997 |
Reported in | (1998)(60)ECC396 |
Appellant | Progressive Extraction and |
Respondent | Commr. of C. Ex. |
It is their contention that they were under bona fide belief that the item manufactured by them is an immovable property and hence are not goods. In this connection, they have relied on several judgments both on the plea of merit as well as on limitation.
2. We have heard both the sides in this matter. The aspect pertaining to the item having come into existence as an immovable property step by step or as the goods, has to be gone into in great detail at the time of final hearing. The learned Consultant submitted that they are entitled for Modvat benefit and if the same is taken into consideration, the duty liability is reduced substantially. The learned Consultant further submits that the appellants will be put to severe hardship, if they are directed to deposit the entire amount. They have filed the affidavit in support of their contention.
3. On a careful consideration of the pleas raised by the appellants and taking into consideration the plea of availability of Modvat credit, we are of the opinion that the appellants be directed to deposit a sum of Rs. 50,000 /- towards duty within a period of 8 weeks from today. On such deposit the balance of duty and penalty shall stand waived and recovery stayed till the final disposal of the appeal.
4. The appeal to come up for reporting compliance on 28th January, 1998.