Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd vs.rekha & Ors - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1207622
CourtDelhi High Court
Decided OnAug-03-2017
AppellantReliance General Insurance Co Ltd
RespondentRekha & Ors
Excerpt:
$~15 * in the high court of delhi at new delhi decided on:03. d august, 2017 + mac.app. 98/2017 and cm33632017 reliance general insurance co ltd ..... appellant rekha & ors through: mr.a.k. soni, advocate versus ........ respondents through: mr.a.n. aggarwal, adv. for r-1 to 4 coram: hon'ble mr. justice r.k.gauba judgment (oral) 1. the accident claim case (macp151516) instituted by first to fourth respondents has been decided by the motor accident claims tribunal, by judgment dated 15.11.2016, awarding compensation in their favour on account of death of shrikant in a motor vehicular accident that allegedly took place on the night of 16 / 17.09.2010 statedly due to negligent driving of a motor vehicle bearing no.dl-1e- 1673.2. the insurance company on which the liability to pay the compensation has been fastened is in appeal raising several contentions including the prime one that involvement of the offending vehicle and negligence on the part of its driver was not proved. mac appeal no.98/2017 page 1 of 2 3. the learned counsel for the claimants concedes that eye witness account was available and the same has not been brought before the tribunal. he, therefore, fairly conceded that the appeal may be allowed and the matter remitted to the tribunal for further inquiry.4. the impugned judgment is set aside. the claim case is remitted to the tribunal for further inquiry in which the claimants will be given opportunity to lead further evidence to prove the involvement and negligence on the part of the driver of the above mentioned vehicle. if so required, having regard to the other contentions urged in the appeal, claimants will also have the liberty to lead further evidence on other aspects as well. needless to add, the tribunal will give an opportunity to the contesting parties to lead evidence in rebuttal, if any, before taking a fresh decision.5. the parties are directed to appear before the tribunal on 04.09.2017.6. the insurance company had deposited the awarded amount with interest in terms of order dated 27.01.2017. the said amount shall be presently refunded.7. 8. the statutory amount shall also be refunded. the appeal and the pending application are disposed of in above terms. august03 2017 yg r.k.gauba, j.mac appeal no.98/2017 page 2 of 2
Judgment:

$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:

03. d August, 2017 + MAC.APP. 98/2017 and CM33632017 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant REKHA & ORS Through: Mr.A.K. Soni, Advocate versus ........ RESPONDENTS

Through: Mr.A.N. Aggarwal, Adv. for R-1 to 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The accident claim case (MACP151516) instituted by first to fourth respondents has been decided by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, by judgment dated 15.11.2016, awarding compensation in their favour on account of death of Shrikant in a motor vehicular accident that allegedly took place on the night of 16 / 17.09.2010 statedly due to negligent driving of a motor vehicle bearing no.DL-1E- 1673.

2. The insurance company on which the liability to pay the compensation has been fastened is in appeal raising several contentions including the prime one that involvement of the offending vehicle and negligence on the part of its driver was not proved. MAC Appeal No.98/2017 Page 1 of 2 3. The learned counsel for the claimants concedes that eye witness account was available and the same has not been brought before the Tribunal. He, therefore, fairly conceded that the appeal may be allowed and the matter remitted to the tribunal for further inquiry.

4. The impugned judgment is set aside. The claim case is remitted to the tribunal for further inquiry in which the claimants will be given opportunity to lead further evidence to prove the involvement and negligence on the part of the driver of the above mentioned vehicle. If so required, having regard to the other contentions urged in the appeal, claimants will also have the liberty to lead further evidence on other aspects as well. Needless to add, the tribunal will give an opportunity to the contesting parties to lead evidence in rebuttal, if any, before taking a fresh decision.

5. The parties are directed to appear before the tribunal on 04.09.2017.

6. The insurance company had deposited the awarded amount with interest in terms of order dated 27.01.2017. The said amount shall be presently refunded.

7. 8. The statutory amount shall also be refunded. The appeal and the pending application are disposed of in above terms. AUGUST03 2017 yg R.K.GAUBA, J.

MAC Appeal No.98/2017 Page 2 of 2