Sh. Marwadi Rajasthan Education Society Thru Its Secretary, Distt. Latur Vs. The State of Maharashtra Thru Collector - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1194098
CourtSupreme Court of India
Decided OnJul-23-2018
Case Number23778 / 2018
JudgeHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
AppellantSh. Marwadi Rajasthan Education Society Thru Its Secretary, Distt. Latur
RespondentThe State of Maharashtra Thru Collector
Advocates:Shashibhushan P. Adgaonkar
Excerpt:
1 in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction non-reportable (@ special leave petition (civil)no.19262 of 2018 (d.no.23778 of civil appeal no.6870 of20182018) sh. marwadi rajasthan education society, latur ….appellant(s) versus the state of maharashtra & anr. ...respondent(s) judgment kurian joseph,j.delay condoned. leave granted. heard learned counsel for the appellant. in the nature of order we propose to pass, it is not necessary to issue notice to the respondents, since the interest of both the parties is protected. the appellant seeks to withdraw the compensation amount deposited in the reference court. the compensation is for the land acquired from the appellant. we permit the appellant to withdraw 50% of the amount deposited without any security. the remaining amount can be withdrawn on furnishing appropriate security to the satisfaction of the reference court. we make it clear that this order will 2 apply to the deposits already made or to be made. the appeal is, accordingly, disposed of. ….......................j.[kurian joseph]. …......................j.[sanjay kishan kaul]. new delhi23d july, 2018
Judgment:

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION NON-REPORTABLE (@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL)No.19262 of 2018 (D.No.23778 OF CIVIL APPEAL No.6870 OF20182018) SH. MARWADI RAJASTHAN EDUCATION SOCIETY, LATUR ….APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. ...RESPONDENT(S)

JUDGMENT

KURIAN JOSEPH,J.

Delay condoned. Leave granted. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. In the nature of order we propose to pass, it is not necessary to issue notice to the respondents, since the interest of both the parties is protected. The appellant seeks to withdraw the compensation amount deposited in the Reference Court. The compensation is for the land acquired from the appellant. We permit the appellant to withdraw 50% of the amount deposited without any security. The remaining amount can be withdrawn on furnishing appropriate security to the satisfaction of the Reference Court. We make it clear that this order will 2 apply to the deposits already made or to be made. The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of. ….......................J.

[KURIAN JOSEPH]. …......................J.

[SANJAY KISHAN KAUL]. NEW DELHI23d JULY, 2018