Asha Education Society Through Its Secretary and Anr. Vs. Nandkishore Shrikrishna Wankhedkar and Anr. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1193414
CourtSupreme Court of India
Decided OnAug-09-2017
Case Number14505 / 2007
JudgeHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH, HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI
AppellantAsha Education Society Through Its Secretary and Anr.
RespondentNandkishore Shrikrishna Wankhedkar and Anr.
Appellant AdvocateShivaji M. Jadhav
Respondent AdvocateAsha Gopalan Nair
Excerpt:
1 non-reportable in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no(s). 6485-6486 of2008asha education society and anr. versus appellant(s) nandkishore shrikrishna wankhedkar and anr. respondent(s) with civil appeal nos. 6488-6489 of2008civil appeal nos. 6490-6491 of2008judgment kurian, j.1. the appellant-management approached this court with certain grievances regarding the direction issued by the tribunal, as affirmed by the high court, for reinstatement with back wages of the teachers under the management. according to the appellants, the appointment was 2. on an year-to-year basis since there was no recognition of the course from the competent authority.3. the learned counsel for the respondent-teachers submits that the termination is against section 5(2) of the maharashtra employees of private schools (conditions of service) regulation act, 1977. 2 4. it is seen from the facts that it was not a case of appointment against the permanent vacancies. even according to the state, the vacancies arose only on a year to year basis and in the case of the appellants' institution and few other schools, it was started on an experimental basis. as they were not able to continue the course on permanent basis, the course was de-recognized on 22.03.2000. therefore, after that year, no recognition was given and consequently, there was no appointment, since there was no course.5. be that as it may, we are informed that after a break of six years, the teachers have been accommodated in some other schools and what survives is only the question, at best, of back wages for the said period. this claim for back wages has to be appreciated 6. in the background of the appointment order. the appointments were made on year to year basis since the recognition was on year to year basis and the course was discontinued also. therefore, the maximum the teachers can pray for, in the facts and circumstances of the case, is back wages for the year before the completion of which they were terminated. 3 7. these appeals are, hence, disposed of with a direction to the appellants to pay the salary and other benefits as should have been available to the teachers for the remaining period of the academic year in which they were terminated. no costs. new delhi; august 09, 2017. .......................j.[ kurian joseph ]. .......................j.[ r. banumathi ]. 4 item no.104 court no.6 section ix s u p r e m e c o u r t o f i n d i a record of proceedings civil appeal no(s). 6485-6486/2008 appellant(s) asha education society and anr. versus nandkishore shrikrishna wankhedkar and anr. with c.a. no.6488-6489/2008 (ix) c.a. no.6490-6491/2008 (ix) date :09. 08-2017 these appeals were called on for hearing today. coram : hon'ble mr. justice kurian joseph hon'ble mrs. justice r. banumathi for appellant(s) respondent(s) for respondent(s) mr. shivaji m. jadhav, aor ms. qurratulain, adv. ms. astha deep, adv. mr. satyajit a. desai, adv. ms. anagha s. desai, aor mr. varun mathur, adv. mr. kunal cheema, adv. mr. yogesh k. ahirrao, adv. mr. nishant r. katneshwarkar, adv. ms. asha gopalan nair, aor order upon hearing the counsel the court made the following the appeals are disposed of in terms of the signed non-reportable judgment. pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. (jayant kumar arora) (suman jain) court master court master (signed non-reportable judgment is placed on the file)
Judgment:

1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 6485-6486 OF2008ASHA EDUCATION SOCIETY AND ANR. VERSUS Appellant(s) NANDKISHORE SHRIKRISHNA WANKHEDKAR AND ANR. Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 6488-6489 OF2008CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 6490-6491 OF2008

JUDGMENT

KURIAN, J.

1. The appellant-Management approached this Court with certain grievances regarding the direction issued by the Tribunal, as affirmed by the High Court, for reinstatement with back wages of the teachers under the Management. According to the appellants, the appointment was 2. on an year-to-year basis since there was no recognition of the course from the competent authority.

3. The learned counsel for the respondent-teachers submits that the termination is against Section 5(2) of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. 2 4. It is seen from the facts that it was not a case of appointment against the permanent vacancies. Even according to the State, the vacancies arose only on a year to year basis and in the case of the appellants' institution and few other schools, it was started on an experimental basis. As they were not able to continue the course on permanent basis, the course was de-recognized on 22.03.2000. Therefore, after that year, no recognition was given and consequently, there was no appointment, since there was no course.

5. Be that as it may, we are informed that after a break of six years, the teachers have been accommodated in some other schools and what survives is only the question, at best, of back wages for the said period. This claim for back wages has to be appreciated 6. in the background of the appointment order. The appointments were made on year to year basis since the recognition was on year to year basis and the course was discontinued also. Therefore, the maximum the teachers can pray for, in the facts and circumstances of the case, is back wages for the year before the completion of which they were terminated. 3 7. These appeals are, hence, disposed of with a direction to the appellants to pay the salary and other benefits as should have been available to the teachers for the remaining period of the academic year in which they were terminated. No costs. New Delhi; August 09, 2017. .......................J.

[ KURIAN JOSEPH ]. .......................J.

[ R. BANUMATHI ]. 4 ITEM NO.104 COURT NO.6 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 6485-6486/2008 Appellant(s) ASHA EDUCATION SOCIETY AND ANR. VERSUS NANDKISHORE SHRIKRISHNA WANKHEDKAR AND ANR. WITH C.A. No.6488-6489/2008 (IX) C.A. No.6490-6491/2008 (IX) Date :

09. 08-2017 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Appellant(s) Respondent(s) For Respondent(s) Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav, AOR Ms. Qurratulain, Adv. Ms. Astha Deep, Adv. Mr. Satyajit A. Desai, Adv. Ms. Anagha S. Desai, AOR Mr. Varun Mathur, Adv. Mr. Kunal Cheema, Adv. Mr. Yogesh K. Ahirrao, Adv. Mr. Nishant R. Katneshwarkar, Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, AOR ORDER

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following The appeals are disposed of in terms of the signed non-reportable Judgment. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. (JAYANT KUMAR ARORA) (SUMAN JAIN) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER (Signed non-reportable Judgment is placed on the file)