B. Balaji Venkatesh Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Theni District and Others - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1192397
CourtChennai Madurai High Court
Decided OnFeb-26-2016
Case NumberCrl.O.P.(MD) No. 3499 of 2016
JudgeP.N. Prakash
AppellantB. Balaji Venkatesh
RespondentThe Superintendent of Police, Theni District and Others
Excerpt:
(prayer: criminal original petition filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., praying to direct the 1st respondent to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents not to interfere in civil dispute based upon the complaint dated 15.02.2016.) 1. this petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents not to interfere in civil dispute based upon the complaint dated 15.02.2016. 2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned government advocate (crl.side) appearing for the respondents and perused the materials placed on record. 3. it is represented by the learned government advocate (crl.side) that, this petitioner has given a complaint against andavar / 5th respondent herein and similarly, on a complaint given by the said andavar against this petitioner, petition enquiry is pending before the 2nd respondent. 4. in view of the above, the petitioner is directed to participate in the enquiry and during enquiry, he shall not be harassed. during the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police is free to register an fir and this order shall not be a shield for the petitioner against arrest. with the above direction, this petition is closed.
Judgment:

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 1st Respondent to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents not to interfere in civil dispute based upon the complaint dated 15.02.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 1st Respondent to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents not to interfere in civil dispute based upon the complaint dated 15.02.2016.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents and perused the materials placed on record.

3. It is represented by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that, this petitioner has given a complaint against Andavar / 5th respondent herein and similarly, on a complaint given by the said Andavar against this petitioner, petition enquiry is pending before the 2nd respondent.

4. In view of the above, the petitioner is directed to participate in the enquiry and during enquiry, he shall not be harassed. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police is free to register an FIR and this order shall not be a shield for the petitioner against arrest.

With the above direction, this petition is closed.