Present: Mr. Sandeep S. Majithia Advocate Vs. State of Haryana and ors. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1152386
CourtPunjab and Haryana High Court
Decided OnJun-19-2014
AppellantPresent: Mr. Sandeep S. Majithia Advocate
RespondentState of Haryana and ors.
Excerpt:
crl.misc. no.m-20893 of 2014 1 in the high court of punjab & haryana at chandigarh crl.misc. no.m-20893 of 2014 date of decision:june 19,2014 meenu and another ....petitioners versus state of haryana and ors...respondents -- coram: hon'ble mr.justice harinder singh sidhu present: mr.sandeep s. majithia, advocate for the petitioners.-- harinder singh sidhu, j.(oral) the present petition has been filed under section 482 cr.p.c.seeking direction to respondents nos.2 to 6 to provide protection to the lives and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents no.7 to 9 and to restrain them from interfering with the matrimonial life of the petitioners.2. it has been averred that petitioner no.1 is stated to be more than 22 years whereas petitioner no.2 is stated to be more than 21 years.photostat copies of high school examination, to this effect are attached by them as annexures p-1 and p-2 respectively. 3. it has been submitted that the marriage of the petitioners was solemnized on 17.06.2014. photostat copy of marriage certificate and the photographs of marriage are attached as annexures p-3 and p-4(colly.) respectively. respondents no.7 to 9 are opposed to the marriage, as the petitioners had performed the marriage without their consent. the kumar dinesh 2014.06.19 16:05 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court,chandigarh crl.misc. no.m-20893 of 2014 2 petitioners have submitted representation dated 17.06.2014 (annexure p-5) to respondent no.2 seeking protection of their lives and liberty at the hands of the private respondents. 4. after hearing counsel for the petitioners and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case or the validity of the marriage and the age of the petitioners and keeping in view the binding precedent of the hon'ble apex court in lata singh versus state of u.p.and another, 2006(2) scc (criminal) 478, the present petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2 to look into the said issue and take necessary action in accordance with law. ( harinder singh sidhu ) judge1906.2014 dinesh kumar dinesh 2014.06.19 16:05 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court,chandigarh
Judgment:

Crl.Misc.

No.M-20893 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.

No.M-20893 of 2014 Date of decision:June 19,2014 Meenu and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and ors...Respondents -- CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU Present: Mr.Sandeep S.

Majithia, Advocate for the petitioneRs.-- HARINDER SINGH SIDHU, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.seeking direction to respondents Nos.2 to 6 to provide protection to the lives and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents No.7 to 9 and to restrain them from interfering with the matrimonial life of the petitioneRs.2.

It has been averred that petitioner no.1 is stated to be more than 22 years whereas petitioner No.2 is stated to be more than 21 yeaRs.Photostat copies of High School Examination, to this effect are attached by them as Annexures P-1 and P-2 respectively.

3.

It has been submitted that the marriage of the petitioners was solemnized on 17.06.2014.

Photostat copy of marriage certificate and the photographs of marriage are attached as Annexures P-3 and P-4(Colly.) respectively.

Respondents No.7 to 9 are opposed to the marriage, as the petitioners had performed the marriage without their consent.

The Kumar Dinesh 2014.06.19 16:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court,Chandigarh Crl.Misc.

No.M-20893 of 2014 2 petitioners have submitted representation dated 17.06.2014 (Annexure P-5) to respondent No.2 seeking protection of their lives and liberty at the hands of the private respondents.

4.

After hearing counsel for the petitioners and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case or the validity of the marriage and the age of the petitioners and keeping in view the binding precedent of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Lata Singh versus State of U.P.And another, 2006(2) SCC (Criminal) 478, the present petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 to look into the said issue and take necessary action in accordance with law.

( HARINDER SINGH SIDHU ) JUDGE1906.2014 dinesh Kumar Dinesh 2014.06.19 16:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court,Chandigarh