Chalakudy N.S.S Educational Cultural; and Charitable Society Vs. E.Narayana Menon - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1142623
CourtKerala High Court
Decided OnMay-29-2014
JudgeHONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
AppellantChalakudy N.S.S Educational Cultural; and Charitable Society
RespondentE.Narayana Menon
Excerpt:
in the high court of keralaat ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice v.chitambaresh thursday, the29h day of may20148th jyaishta, 1936 op(c).no. 1224 of 2014 (o) --------------------------- os4422008 of sub court,irinjalakuda petitioner(s): -------------------------- 1. chalakudy n.s.s educational, cultural and charitable society chalakudy rep. by its vice president having the charge of president adhithya varma raja, aged70years s/o. korattiswaroopathinkal kavu thampuran of poolani kovilakam residing at meloor village, same desom mukundapuram taluk and joint secretary in charge of the secretary prakash kumar.c, s/o. kumaran nair, chittiyattu house chalakudy desom, east chalakudy village mukundapuram taluk.2. c.p. jayasanker, aged45years s/o. v.k.p. menon, indeevaram ankamali desom, kothakulangara village kidangoor p.o., aluva taluk ernakulam district.3. prakash kumar c., aged46years s/o. kumaran nair, chittiyath house chalakudy desom, east chalakudy village mukundapuram taluk, thrissur district. by advs.sri.renjith thampan (sr.) smt.p.r.reena respondent(s): ---------------------------- 1. e.narayana menon, aged71years s/o. vyreli krishnan nair chenathnadu desom, kizhakke chalakudy village, mukundapuram taluk, thrissur district pin680307.2. govinda panicker, aged80years s/o. kallarakkal veettil krishnan nair chenathnadu desom, kizhekke chalakudy village mukundapuram taluk, thrissur district pin680307. op(c) no. 1224/2014 3. chandrasekharan, sreenilayam (kummayil house), r.b. road kizhakke chalakudy village mukundapuram taluk, thrissur district pin680307.4. ajith kumar, aged43years s/o. kuzhikkattil veettil kochunarayana menon i.q. road desom, kizhekke chalakudy village thrissur district pin680307.5. mohanan, s/o. pukkatt veettil gouriamma near nadathamppilly temple, kizhakke chalakudy village, mukundapuram taluk thrissur district pin680307.6. sadanandan, aged61years kuzhikkattil house, i.q. road, kizhekke chalakudy village mukundapuram taluk thrissur district pin680307.7. sreekumar, s/o. kuzhikkattil veettil madhavan nair, i.q. road desom kizhekke chalakudy village mukundapuram taluk thrissur district pin680307.8. balakrishnan, aged68years s/o. thappattveettil madhavi amma padinjare chalakudy village mukundapuram taluk thrissur district pin680307.9. ashok kumar, aged51years s/o. meledath veetil sankaran nair padinjare chalakudy village, same desom mukundapuram taluk thrissur district pin680307.10. madhava menon, aged74years s/o. mullassery veettil pappikutty amma pottavillage, desom, mukundapuram taluk thrissur district pin68030.7. this op (civil) having come up for admission on2905-2014, the court on the same day delivered the following: op(c) no. 1224/2014 appendix petitioner(s) exhibits exhibit p1 : true copy of the remand order passed by the district court thrissur dated2805.2012 remanding ia48872008 respondent(s) exhibits : nil /true copy/ p.a. to judge. v. chitambaresh, j -------------------------------- op(c) no. 1224 of2014------------------------------------ dated this the 29th day of may, 2014 judgment the lower appellate court has by the impugned judgment remanded the application for violation of injunction to be considered independently. the course adopted by the court below cannot be faulted with since proceedings under order xxxix rule 2 a of the code of civil procedure are independent.2. i however take note of the fact that the final verdict in the suit and in the appeal therefrom has gone in favour of the petitioner. moreover more than six years have elapsed since the date of alleged violation of the order of injunction. the petitioners contend that the alleged act was due to an oversight and that they are prepared to offer an unconditional apology.3. the above are matters to be taken into consideration at the time of disposal of i.a. no. 4887/2008 in o.s. no. 442/2008 on the file of the court of the subordinate judge of irinjalakuda. the court below shall take a pragmatic view of the 2 op(c) no. 1224/2014 matter in view of the efflux of time and the changed circumstances. the original petition is disposed of. v. chitambaresh judge ncd
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALAAT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH THURSDAY, THE29H DAY OF MAY20148TH JYAISHTA, 1936 OP(C).No. 1224 of 2014 (O) --------------------------- OS4422008 of SUB COURT,IRINJALAKUDA PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- 1. CHALAKUDY N.S.S EDUCATIONAL, CULTURAL AND CHARITABLE SOCIETY CHALAKUDY REP. BY ITS VICE PRESIDENT HAVING THE CHARGE OF PRESIDENT ADHITHYA VARMA RAJA, AGED70YEARS S/O. KORATTISWAROOPATHINKAL KAVU THAMPURAN OF POOLANI KOVILAKAM RESIDING AT MELOOR VILLAGE, SAME DESOM MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK AND JOINT SECRETARY IN CHARGE OF THE SECRETARY PRAKASH KUMAR.C, S/O. KUMARAN NAIR, CHITTIYATTU HOUSE CHALAKUDY DESOM, EAST CHALAKUDY VILLAGE MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.

2. C.P. JAYASANKER, AGED45YEARS S/O. V.K.P. MENON, INDEEVARAM ANKAMALI DESOM, KOTHAKULANGARA VILLAGE KIDANGOOR P.O., ALUVA TALUK ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

3. PRAKASH KUMAR C., AGED46YEARS S/O. KUMARAN NAIR, CHITTIYATH HOUSE CHALAKUDY DESOM, EAST CHALAKUDY VILLAGE MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN (SR.) SMT.P.R.REENA RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. E.NARAYANA MENON, AGED71YEARS S/O. VYRELI KRISHNAN NAIR CHENATHNADU DESOM, KIZHAKKE CHALAKUDY VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT PIN680307.

2. GOVINDA PANICKER, AGED80YEARS S/O. KALLARAKKAL VEETTIL KRISHNAN NAIR CHENATHNADU DESOM, KIZHEKKE CHALAKUDY VILLAGE MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT PIN680307. OP(C) NO. 1224/2014 3. CHANDRASEKHARAN, SREENILAYAM (KUMMAYIL HOUSE), R.B. ROAD KIZHAKKE CHALAKUDY VILLAGE MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT PIN680307.

4. AJITH KUMAR, AGED43YEARS S/O. KUZHIKKATTIL VEETTIL KOCHUNARAYANA MENON I.Q. ROAD DESOM, KIZHEKKE CHALAKUDY VILLAGE THRISSUR DISTRICT PIN680307.

5. MOHANAN, S/O. PUKKATT VEETTIL GOURIAMMA NEAR NADATHAMPPILLY TEMPLE, KIZHAKKE CHALAKUDY VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK THRISSUR DISTRICT PIN680307.

6. SADANANDAN, AGED61YEARS KUZHIKKATTIL HOUSE, I.Q. ROAD, KIZHEKKE CHALAKUDY VILLAGE MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK THRISSUR DISTRICT PIN680307.

7. SREEKUMAR, S/O. KUZHIKKATTIL VEETTIL MADHAVAN NAIR, I.Q. ROAD DESOM KIZHEKKE CHALAKUDY VILLAGE MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK THRISSUR DISTRICT PIN680307.

8. BALAKRISHNAN, AGED68YEARS S/O. THAPPATTVEETTIL MADHAVI AMMA PADINJARE CHALAKUDY VILLAGE MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK THRISSUR DISTRICT PIN680307.

9. ASHOK KUMAR, AGED51YEARS S/O. MELEDATH VEETIL SANKARAN NAIR PADINJARE CHALAKUDY VILLAGE, SAME DESOM MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK THRISSUR DISTRICT PIN680307.

10. MADHAVA MENON, AGED74YEARS S/O. MULLASSERY VEETTIL PAPPIKUTTY AMMA POTTAVILLAGE, DESOM, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK THRISSUR DISTRICT PIN68030.7. THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON2905-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: OP(C) NO. 1224/2014 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE REMAND ORDER

PASSED BY THE DISTRICT COURT THRISSUR DATED2805.2012 REMANDING IA48872008 RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. V. CHITAMBARESH, J -------------------------------- OP(C) NO. 1224 OF2014------------------------------------ Dated this the 29th day of May, 2014 JUDGMENT

The lower appellate court has by the impugned judgment remanded the application for violation of injunction to be considered independently. The course adopted by the court below cannot be faulted with since proceedings under Order XXXIX Rule 2 A of the Code of Civil Procedure are independent.

2. I however take note of the fact that the final verdict in the suit and in the appeal therefrom has gone in favour of the petitioner. Moreover more than six years have elapsed since the date of alleged violation of the order of injunction. The petitioners contend that the alleged act was due to an oversight and that they are prepared to offer an unconditional apology.

3. The above are matters to be taken into consideration at the time of disposal of I.A. No. 4887/2008 in O.S. No. 442/2008 on the file of the court of the Subordinate Judge of Irinjalakuda. The court below shall take a pragmatic view of the 2 OP(C) No. 1224/2014 matter in view of the efflux of time and the changed circumstances. The Original Petition is disposed of. V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE ncd