Ajmal Vs. Nafeesa - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1134712
CourtKerala High Court
Decided OnMar-17-2014
JudgeHONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
AppellantAjmal
RespondentNafeesa
Excerpt:
in the high court of keralaat ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice v.chitambaresh monday, the17h day of march201426th phalguna, 1935 op(c).no. 749 of 2014 (o) -------------------------- against the order dated0301.2014 in ia no. 1896/2013 in fdia no. 395/2011 in os no. 87/2009 of the sub court, vatakara petitioner(s): ------------------------ ajmal, aged41years s/o.mahamood, residing at al-hilal vatakaraamsom desom, vatakara, kozhikode district. by advs.sri.r.sudhish smt.m.manju respondent(s)/respondents:-: -------------------------------------------------- 1. nafeesa, w/o.mahamood, roshni manzil, nadakku thazhaamsom puthur desom, vatakara taluk, kozhikode - 673 104.2. khamarunnisa, w/o.naseer, roshni manzil, nadakku thazhaamsom puthur desom, vatakara taluk, kozhikode - 673 104.3. roshni, w/o.sulfikker, roshni manzil, nadakku thazhaamsom puthur desom, vatakara taluk, kozhikode - 673 104.4. faseela, w/o.faisal, roshni manzil, nadakku thazhaamsom puthur desom, vatakara taluk, kozhikode - 673 104.5. abdulazeez, s/o.abdul rehman, koyilandy valappil house vatakaraamsom desom, vatakara, kozhikode - 673 104.6. ashraf, s/o.mahamood, reema cottage, vatakaraamsom desom vatakara, kozhikode - 673 104. r1 by adv. sri.u.k.devidas, adv. sri.k.lakshminarayanan this op (civil) having come up for admission on1703-2014, along with opc. 362/2014, the court on the same day delivered the following: op(c).no. 749 of 2014 (o) appendix petitioner(s)' exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of the petition i.a.no.1896 of2013filed by petitioner before the sub court, vatakara dated0609.2013. exhibit p2 true copy of the work memo filed by the petitioner in f.d.i.a. no.395 of2011in o.s.no.87 of2009of sub court, vatakara dated0507.2012. exhibit p3 true copy of the plan prepared by the advocate commissioner in f.d.i.a. no.395 of2011in o.s.no.87/2009 of sub court, vatakara. exhibit p4 true copy of the report prepared by the advocate commissioner in f.d.i.a. no.395 of2011in o.s.no.87 of2009of sub court, vatakara dated1912.2012. exhibit p5 true copy of the common order in i.a.no.618 of2013and i.a.no.1896/2013 in fdia no.395/2011 in o.s.no.87/2009 on the files of the sub court, vatakara dated0301.2014. respondent(s)' exhibits : nil /true copy/ p.a. to judge. v. chitambaresh, j -------------------------------- op(c) nos. 749 & 362 of2014------------------------------------ dated this the 17th day of march, 2014 judgment an order refusing to set aside the report and plan in the final decree proceedings in a suit for partition is impugned. the petitioners in op(c) no. 362/2014 are the plaintiffs and the petitioner in op(c) no. 749/2014 is the third defendant. the report and plan of the advocate commissioner reveals the following: name share entitled extent (cents) plots allotted plaintiff 22/40 8.91 plot a, a1,a2 1st defendant 10/40 4.71 plot d2d defendant 4/40 1.57 plots c, c1 3rd defendant 4/40 1.58 plot b.2. i do not find any sufficient ground to set aside the report and plan of the advocate commissioner as noticed by the court below. i hasten to add that the allotment made by the advocate commissioner is purely provisional and tentative. the final decree court shall hear the parties at length and decide as to whether the allotment has to made absolute or not. the final 2 op(c) nos. 749 & 362 of 2014 decree court is entitled to make alterations or exchanges between the sharers to suit their convenience. this shall be done untrammeled by any observations contained in the order impugned. the original petitions are disposed of. v. chitambaresh judge ncd
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALAAT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE17H DAY OF MARCH201426TH PHALGUNA, 1935 OP(C).No. 749 of 2014 (O) -------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER

DATED0301.2014 IN IA NO. 1896/2013 IN FDIA NO. 395/2011 IN OS NO. 87/2009 OF THE SUB COURT, VATAKARA PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ AJMAL, AGED41YEARS S/O.MAHAMOOD, RESIDING AT AL-HILAL VATAKARAAMSOM DESOM, VATAKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.R.SUDHISH SMT.M.MANJU RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:-: -------------------------------------------------- 1. NAFEESA, W/O.MAHAMOOD, ROSHNI MANZIL, NADAKKU THAZHAAMSOM PUTHUR DESOM, VATAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE - 673 104.

2. KHAMARUNNISA, W/O.NASEER, ROSHNI MANZIL, NADAKKU THAZHAAMSOM PUTHUR DESOM, VATAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE - 673 104.

3. ROSHNI, W/O.SULFIKKER, ROSHNI MANZIL, NADAKKU THAZHAAMSOM PUTHUR DESOM, VATAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE - 673 104.

4. FASEELA, W/O.FAISAL, ROSHNI MANZIL, NADAKKU THAZHAAMSOM PUTHUR DESOM, VATAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE - 673 104.

5. ABDULAZEEZ, S/O.ABDUL REHMAN, KOYILANDY VALAPPIL HOUSE VATAKARAAMSOM DESOM, VATAKARA, KOZHIKODE - 673 104.

6. ASHRAF, S/O.MAHAMOOD, REEMA COTTAGE, VATAKARAAMSOM DESOM VATAKARA, KOZHIKODE - 673 104. R1 BY ADV. SRI.U.K.DEVIDAS, ADV. SRI.K.LAKSHMINARAYANAN THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON1703-2014, ALONG WITH OPC. 362/2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: OP(C).No. 749 of 2014 (O) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION I.A.NO.1896 OF2013FILED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE SUB COURT, VATAKARA DATED0609.2013. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE WORK MEMO FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN F.D.I.A. NO.395 OF2011IN O.S.NO.87 OF2009OF SUB COURT, VATAKARA DATED0507.2012. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE PLAN PREPARED BY THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER IN F.D.I.A. NO.395 OF2011IN O.S.NO.87/2009 OF SUB COURT, VATAKARA. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT PREPARED BY THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER IN F.D.I.A. NO.395 OF2011IN O.S.NO.87 OF2009OF SUB COURT, VATAKARA DATED1912.2012. EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON ORDER

IN I.A.NO.618 OF2013AND I.A.NO.1896/2013 IN FDIA NO.395/2011 IN O.S.NO.87/2009 ON THE FILES OF THE SUB COURT, VATAKARA DATED0301.2014. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. V. CHITAMBARESH, J -------------------------------- OP(C) NOs. 749 & 362 OF2014------------------------------------ Dated this the 17th day of March, 2014 JUDGMENT

An order refusing to set aside the report and plan in the final decree proceedings in a suit for partition is impugned. The petitioners in OP(C) No. 362/2014 are the plaintiffs and the petitioner in OP(C) No. 749/2014 is the third defendant. The report and plan of the Advocate Commissioner reveals the following: Name Share entitled Extent (cents) Plots allotted Plaintiff 22/40 8.91 Plot A, A1,A2 1st defendant 10/40 4.71 Plot D2d defendant 4/40 1.57 Plots C, C1 3rd defendant 4/40 1.58 Plot B.

2. I do not find any sufficient ground to set aside the report and plan of the Advocate Commissioner as noticed by the court below. I hasten to add that the allotment made by the Advocate Commissioner is purely provisional and tentative. The final decree court shall hear the parties at length and decide as to whether the allotment has to made absolute or not. The final 2 OP(C) Nos. 749 & 362 of 2014 decree court is entitled to make alterations or exchanges between the sharers to suit their convenience. This shall be done untrammeled by any observations contained in the order impugned. The Original Petitions are disposed of. V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE ncd