Sarvan Kaur and Another Vs. Sarvan Kaur and Another - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1129458
CourtPunjab and Haryana High Court
Decided OnFeb-24-2014
AppellantSarvan Kaur and Another
RespondentSarvan Kaur and Another
Excerpt:
crl.m.no.m-6566 of 2014 (o&m) -1- in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh. crl.m.no.m-6566 of 2014 (o&m) date of decision: february 24, 2014 sarvan kaur and another .....petitioners v. state of punjab and others ......respondents coram: hon'ble mr.justice ram chand gupta present: petitioners in person with mr.k.s.lakhanpal, advocate....ram chand gupta, j.(oral) the present petition filed under section 482 cr.p.c.is for issuance of direction to respondent nos.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent nos.4 to 6. heard. learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners will be satisfied if respondent no.2, i.e., senior superintendent of police, gurdaspur, is directed to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 19.2.2014, annexure p5, already made to him by the petitioners.as per averments made in the petition both the petitioners are major. date of birth of petitioner no.1-sarvan kaur, as per copy of matriculation examination certificate, annexure p1, is 30.5.1994, and date of birth of petitioner no.2- varinder singh, as per copy of passport, annexure p2, is 1.3.1984. they got married on 19.2.2014, as per marriage certificate, annexure p3. photographs of the marriage are annexure p4. in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioners.this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2, i.e.,senior superintendent of police, gurdaspur, to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 19.2.2014, annexure p5, meenu already stated to have been moved to him by the petitioners.2014.02.26 10:12 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh crl.m.no.m-6566 of 2014 (o&m) -2- however, it is made clear that this order will be having no effect on the validity of alleged marriage of petitioners and also on any other civil or criminal proceedings instituted against petitioner no.2 as per law. 24.2.2014 (ram chand gupta) meenu judge meenu 2014.02.26 10:12 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh
Judgment:

Crl.M.No.M-6566 of 2014 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl.M.No.M-6566 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 24, 2014 Sarvan Kaur and another .....Petitioners v.

State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Petitioners in person with Mr.K.S.Lakhanpal, Advocate....RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.is for issuance of direction to respondent nos.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent nos.4 to 6.

Heard.

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners will be satisfied if respondent no.2, i.e., Senior Superintendent of Police, Gurdaspur, is directed to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 19.2.2014, Annexure P5, already made to him by the petitioneRs.As per averments made in the petition both the petitioners are major.

Date of birth of petitioner no.1-Sarvan Kaur, as per copy of Matriculation Examination Certificate, Annexure P1, is 30.5.1994, and date of birth of petitioner No.2- Varinder Singh, as per copy of Passport, Annexure P2, is 1.3.1984.

They got married on 19.2.2014, as per marriage certificate, Annexure P3.

Photographs of the marriage are Annexure P4.

In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioneRs.this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2, i.e.,Senior Superintendent of Police, Gurdaspur, to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 19.2.2014, Annexure P5, Meenu already stated to have been moved to him by the petitioneRs.2014.02.26 10:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh Crl.M.No.M-6566 of 2014 (O&M) -2- However, it is made clear that this order will be having no effect on the validity of alleged marriage of petitioners and also on any other civil or criminal proceedings instituted against petitioner no.2 as per law.

24.2.2014 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge Meenu 2014.02.26 10:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh